* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
@ 2013-01-15 12:49 ` Sergey Popov
2013-01-15 20:23 ` Mike Pagano
2013-01-15 19:05 ` Robin H. Johnson
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Popov @ 2013-01-15 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 425 bytes --]
13.01.2013 02:49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
> # pinkbyte
> app-shells/ccsh-0.0.4-r3
> app-shells/rrs-1.70-r1
> dev-libs/jthread-1.3.1
Ok for them
> # netmon
> dev-libs/geoip-1.4.8-r2
Ok for it
And thanks for your work.
--
Best regards, Sergey Popov
Gentoo Linux Developer
Desktop-effects project lead
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 554 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-15 12:49 ` Sergey Popov
@ 2013-01-15 20:23 ` Mike Pagano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Mike Pagano @ 2013-01-15 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
13.01.2013 02:49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>Please review attached automatically generated stabilizatiocandidates
>for January.
>
>
# mpagano kernel-misc
sys-kernel/linux-docs-3.6.
I'll do this for the just committed version linux-docs-3.6.11. What I will do
for now on is change our stabilization procedure for kernels to include
opening up a bug to stabilize the corresponding linux-docs version.
So going forward, you can exclude this and hopefully we'll do a better job of
keeping this package stable.
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpagano@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3&op=index
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2013-01-15 12:49 ` Sergey Popov
@ 2013-01-15 19:05 ` Robin H. Johnson
2013-01-15 19:10 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-01-15 19:52 ` Markos Chandras
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2013-01-15 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 02:49:52PM -0800, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> # robbat2
> app-admin/diradm-2.9.7.1
+1
> # robbat2
> app-shells/localshell-1.3.4
+1
> # netmon
> dev-libs/geoip-1.4.8-r2
+0.5 looking for another vote
> # base-system
> sys-apps/irqbalance-1.0.5
+1
> # base-system
> sys-apps/sg3_utils-1.34
+1
> # base-system
> sys-block/aoetools-35
+0.5
> # sysadmin
> sys-libs/freeipmi-1.2.3-r1
+0.5
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2013-01-15 12:49 ` Sergey Popov
2013-01-15 19:05 ` Robin H. Johnson
@ 2013-01-15 19:52 ` Markos Chandras
2013-01-15 19:59 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Markos Chandras @ 2013-01-15 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 12 January 2013 22:49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
>
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
>
> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
>
> Paweł
ack for the packages I maintain
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-15 19:52 ` Markos Chandras
@ 2013-01-15 19:59 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2013-01-15 20:14 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Dirkjan Ochtman @ 2013-01-15 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo Development
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:49 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
<phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
I filed dev-python/paramiko-1.9.0 myself. :)
Cheers,
Dirkjan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-15 19:59 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
@ 2013-01-15 20:14 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
2013-01-16 13:58 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Panagiotis Christopoulos @ 2013-01-15 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 563 bytes --]
On 14:49 Sat 12 Jan , "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
>
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
>
I'm just curious, how this actually works. Do you have a script that
checks specific categories/packages for dependencies, open bugs. etc.?
--
Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist )
( Gentoo Lisp Project )
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-15 20:14 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
@ 2013-01-16 13:58 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-01-16 18:09 ` Matt Turner
2013-01-16 14:08 ` Michael Weber
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina @ 2013-01-16 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2013 05:49 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
>
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
>
> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
>
> Paweł
>
net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017
be my guest, although I prefer the bugs personally.
- -ZC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=8OSJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-16 13:58 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
@ 2013-01-16 18:09 ` Matt Turner
2013-01-17 0:27 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Matt Turner @ 2013-01-16 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
<zerochaos@gentoo.org> wrote:
> net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017
>
> be my guest, although I prefer the bugs personally.
That's what he's doing... asking maintainers if it's okay to open
stabilization bugs for their packages.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-16 18:09 ` Matt Turner
@ 2013-01-17 0:27 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-01-17 2:20 ` Matt Turner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina @ 2013-01-17 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2013 01:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually
missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a
lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails
that I have to search through.
- -ZC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=6mSE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-17 0:27 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
@ 2013-01-17 2:20 ` Matt Turner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Matt Turner @ 2013-01-17 2:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
> honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually
> missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a
> lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails
> that I have to search through.
So ignore it and he'll open bugs just the same. This was just an early
opportunity for people to say "no, this shouldn't be stabilized."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-16 13:58 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
@ 2013-01-16 14:08 ` Michael Weber
2013-01-16 18:14 ` Tomáš Chvátal
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Michael Weber @ 2013-01-16 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 01/12/2013 11:49 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization
> candidates for January.
cool
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at
> the same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the
> effort to keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
you can add me to the whitelist for bug filing.
Would you mind adding my
# xmw
app-laptop/thinkfan-0.8.1-r1
Thanks!
> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of
> exclusions for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by
> maintainers.
Do you/we have any ready-to-use script to file stable requestst?
I know it's just dome lines of python but I'm lazy.
To lazy to get all these 10-something clicks'n'paste right to file
such bugs on first attempt.
Michael
- --
Michael Weber
Gentoo Developer
web: https://xmw.de/
mailto: Michael Weber <xmw@gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iF4EAREIAAYFAlD2tEgACgkQknrdDGLu8JCXjwEAmnSj0mvW7hxJgNHSux+P0P/I
ikSyI6XM357KIvU7DX0BAI1Nb6IyKJUq2GNhJCMUaX9RAEL1BvZLczPq+uCAkPvU
=X8G6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-16 14:08 ` Michael Weber
@ 2013-01-16 18:14 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2013-01-22 12:31 ` Mike Pagano
2013-01-17 19:04 ` Thomas Beierlein
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Tomáš Chvátal @ 2013-01-16 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1058 bytes --]
Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a):
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
>
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
>
> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
>
> Paweł
Hmm, nice idea but how about expanding metadata.xml with something like info
for stabilisations so they can be automatically grabbed for it. Quite few
software is just nice enough that it can go automatically for stable in 30
days, and someone could just go then and open new bugs (with assigned arches)
based on it (of course it expects brain from the guy reporting it that he
checks if there are no open bugs).
Because mails to -dev are frankly annoying. :-)
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-16 18:14 ` Tomáš Chvátal
@ 2013-01-22 12:31 ` Mike Pagano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Mike Pagano @ 2013-01-22 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 07:14:12 PM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a):
> > Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> > for January.
> >
> > I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> > same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> > keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
> >
> > I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> > continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
> > for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
> >
> > Paweł
>
> Hmm, nice idea but how about expanding metadata.xml with something like info
> for stabilisations so they can be automatically grabbed for it. Quite few
> software is just nice enough that it can go automatically for stable in 30
> days, and someone could just go then and open new bugs (with assigned
arches)
> based on it (of course it expects brain from the guy reporting it that he
> checks if there are no open bugs).
>
> Because mails to -dev are frankly annoying. :-)
>
> Tom
Tom,
This is a better idea. I also believe this one can be auto stablized after 30
days. It's just kernel documentation.
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Team Lead - Gentoo Sources
E-Mail : mpagano@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3&op=index
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-16 18:14 ` Tomáš Chvátal
@ 2013-01-17 19:04 ` Thomas Beierlein
2013-01-22 13:25 ` Petteri Räty
2013-02-10 11:22 ` [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
10 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Beierlein @ 2013-01-17 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:49:52 -0800
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization
> candidates for January.
>
# tomjbe
media-libs/hamlib-1.2.15.3
media-radio/tlf-1.1.5
media-radio/xastir-2.0.4
are good to go. I put stable requests in bugzi already.
Thanks for reminding Paweł.
Thomas
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-17 19:04 ` Thomas Beierlein
@ 2013-01-22 13:25 ` Petteri Räty
2013-01-22 13:39 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2013-01-22 13:44 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2013-02-10 11:22 ` [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
10 siblings, 2 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Petteri Räty @ 2013-01-22 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 883 bytes --]
On 13.1.2013 0.49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
>
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
>
> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
>
I have an RSS feed for this purpose at:
http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss
Sources are available here:
https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog
Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo
infrastructure so more people know about it and use it?
Regards,
Petteri
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 866 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-22 13:25 ` Petteri Räty
@ 2013-01-22 13:39 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2013-01-22 13:44 ` Theo Chatzimichos
1 sibling, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Tomáš Chvátal @ 2013-01-22 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
2013/1/22 Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>:
>
> I have an RSS feed for this purpose at:
>
> http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss
>
> Sources are available here:
>
> https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog
>
> Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo
> infrastructure so more people know about it and use it?
Yup that would be nice.
Also we could really finegrain it based on metadata.xml settings if
someone really wants to exclude his packages, and also we could think
if it should be opt-out or opt-in.
Cheers
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-22 13:25 ` Petteri Räty
2013-01-22 13:39 ` Tomáš Chvátal
@ 2013-01-22 13:44 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2013-01-23 0:57 ` [gentoo-dev] stabilization candidates rss feed & html pages Brian Dolbec
1 sibling, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Theo Chatzimichos @ 2013-01-22 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 13.1.2013 0.49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
>> for January.
>>
>> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
>> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
>> keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
>>
>> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
>> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
>> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
>>
>
> I have an RSS feed for this purpose at:
>
> http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss
>
> Sources are available here:
>
> https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog
>
> Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo
> infrastructure so more people know about it and use it?
File a bug against us then, with all the information needed for the deployment
Theo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] stabilization candidates rss feed & html pages
2013-01-22 13:44 ` Theo Chatzimichos
@ 2013-01-23 0:57 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-01-23 3:15 ` Rafael Goncalves Martins
2013-01-23 10:50 ` Theo Chatzimichos
0 siblings, 2 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Brian Dolbec @ 2013-01-23 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Federico fox Scrinzi, iksaif
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2007 bytes --]
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 14:44 +0100, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 13.1.2013 0.49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> >> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> >> for January.
> >>
> >> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> >> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> >> keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
> >>
> >> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> >> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
> >> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
> >>
> >
> > I have an RSS feed for this purpose at:
> >
> > http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss
> >
> > Sources are available here:
> >
> > https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog
> >
> > Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo
> > infrastructure so more people know about it and use it?
>
> File a bug against us then, with all the information needed for the deployment
>
> Theo
>
I had a look at the script, unfortunately (for me), it's both a ruby
script and deps on paludis to get the information.
Personally I think this would work well, but re-written in python and
use portage for info. As euscan is all about scanning for upgradeable
pkgs, it is already getting updated pkg info, scanning metadata.xml,
etc. using portage, gentoolkit, and custom code. So this would fit well
with it. It is python, django based. It could also offer the rss feed
in a web page with a search box, and/or integrate the candidates into
the pkgs status reports it does.
Second reason, I believe it is getting or already has deployment on
gentoo infra servers.
I pinged `fox` in #-www about it, Corentin <iksaif> wasn't online there
at the time. cc'ing them here.
--
Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization candidates rss feed & html pages
2013-01-23 0:57 ` [gentoo-dev] stabilization candidates rss feed & html pages Brian Dolbec
@ 2013-01-23 3:15 ` Rafael Goncalves Martins
2013-01-23 5:22 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-01-23 9:51 ` Federico "fox" Scrinzi
2013-01-23 10:50 ` Theo Chatzimichos
1 sibling, 2 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Rafael Goncalves Martins @ 2013-01-23 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo Development; +Cc: Federico fox Scrinzi, iksaif
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 14:44 +0100, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> > On 13.1.2013 0.49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> >> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
>> >> for January.
>> >>
>> >> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
>> >> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
>> >> keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
>> >>
>> >> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
>> >> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
>> >> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I have an RSS feed for this purpose at:
>> >
>> > http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss
>> >
>> > Sources are available here:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog
>> >
>> > Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo
>> > infrastructure so more people know about it and use it?
>>
>> File a bug against us then, with all the information needed for the deployment
>>
>> Theo
>>
> I had a look at the script, unfortunately (for me), it's both a ruby
> script and deps on paludis to get the information.
>
> Personally I think this would work well, but re-written in python and
> use portage for info. As euscan is all about scanning for upgradeable
> pkgs, it is already getting updated pkg info, scanning metadata.xml,
> etc. using portage, gentoolkit, and custom code. So this would fit well
> with it. It is python, django based. It could also offer the rss feed
> in a web page with a search box, and/or integrate the candidates into
> the pkgs status reports it does.
>
> Second reason, I believe it is getting or already has deployment on
> gentoo infra servers.
>
> I pinged `fox` in #-www about it, Corentin <iksaif> wasn't online there
> at the time. cc'ing them here.
I think that euscan would benefit of this feature, but the your
arguments against ruby/paludis aren't valid IMO. If the euscan guys
want to integrate the feature, nice. If not, lets just stick with this
script. It is simple enough that even ruby n00bs like me can
understand what it does :P
BR.
--
Rafael Goncalves Martins
Gentoo Linux developer
http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization candidates rss feed & html pages
2013-01-23 3:15 ` Rafael Goncalves Martins
@ 2013-01-23 5:22 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-01-23 9:51 ` Federico "fox" Scrinzi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Brian Dolbec @ 2013-01-23 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Federico fox Scrinzi, iksaif
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3611 bytes --]
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 01:15 -0200, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 14:44 +0100, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> > On 13.1.2013 0.49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> >> >> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> >> >> for January.
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> >> >> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> >> >> keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
> >> >>
> >> >> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> >> >> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
> >> >> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I have an RSS feed for this purpose at:
> >> >
> >> > http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss
> >> >
> >> > Sources are available here:
> >> >
> >> > https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog
> >> >
> >> > Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo
> >> > infrastructure so more people know about it and use it?
> >>
> >> File a bug against us then, with all the information needed for the deployment
> >>
> >> Theo
> >>
> > I had a look at the script, unfortunately (for me), it's both a ruby
> > script and deps on paludis to get the information.
> >
> > Personally I think this would work well, but re-written in python and
> > use portage for info. As euscan is all about scanning for upgradeable
> > pkgs, it is already getting updated pkg info, scanning metadata.xml,
> > etc. using portage, gentoolkit, and custom code. So this would fit well
> > with it. It is python, django based. It could also offer the rss feed
> > in a web page with a search box, and/or integrate the candidates into
> > the pkgs status reports it does.
> >
> > Second reason, I believe it is getting or already has deployment on
> > gentoo infra servers.
> >
> > I pinged `fox` in #-www about it, Corentin <iksaif> wasn't online there
> > at the time. cc'ing them here.
>
> I think that euscan would benefit of this feature, but the your
> arguments against ruby/paludis aren't valid IMO.
That's exactly why I put in the "(for me)" in that statement.
> If the euscan guys
> want to integrate the feature, nice.
Since Euscan is python, django based and already using python interfaces
to portage, gentoolkit. It would be logical to redo it in python. But
I believe it is set up to be able to run pretty much any script/binary
as well.
If this script gets run on gentoo infra, then euscan can just use that
feed for display and add code to parse it for it's other reports.
It is likely simpler for euscan to add picking up the additional data to
produce the stabilization reports/feeds while it is scanning the newly
sync'd tree and updating it's db. Producing the rss feed is simple at
that point. Plus the data for other report formats would already be in
it's db, making the rest of the displays simpler.
> If not, lets just stick with this
> script.
Let's wait to hear from Corentin and Federico on it...
> It is simple enough that even ruby n00bs like me can
> understand what it does :P
>
> BR.
>
>
It is for me too.
> --
> Rafael Goncalves Martins
> Gentoo Linux developer
> http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/
>
--
Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization candidates rss feed & html pages
2013-01-23 3:15 ` Rafael Goncalves Martins
2013-01-23 5:22 ` Brian Dolbec
@ 2013-01-23 9:51 ` Federico "fox" Scrinzi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Federico "fox" Scrinzi @ 2013-01-23 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 531 bytes --]
> If the euscan guys want to integrate the feature, nice.
> If not, lets just stick with this script. It is simple enough that even
> ruby n00bs like me can understand what it does :P
I'm a ruby noob and seems pretty simple, I don't think that porting it
to python would be a huge effort. Moreover we can base it on existing
euscan code.
I'll talk with Corentin about that ;)
Thanks!
--
f.
"There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache
invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors."
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 899 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization candidates rss feed & html pages
2013-01-23 0:57 ` [gentoo-dev] stabilization candidates rss feed & html pages Brian Dolbec
2013-01-23 3:15 ` Rafael Goncalves Martins
@ 2013-01-23 10:50 ` Theo Chatzimichos
1 sibling, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Theo Chatzimichos @ 2013-01-23 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Second reason, I believe it is getting or already has deployment on
> gentoo infra servers.
euscan is not getting implemented on infra server because noone
requested it. Again, whoever is responsible for any service and wants
it implemented in our servers needs to file a bug assigned to infra
Theo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
2013-01-12 22:49 [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-22 13:25 ` Petteri Räty
@ 2013-02-10 11:22 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2013-02-10 11:38 ` Ralph Sennhauser
10 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." @ 2013-02-10 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 769 bytes --]
On 1/12/13 11:49 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
Oops, today I've tried my _separate_ script to file stabilization bugs
based on a generated list of packages to support that workflow.
Now the bug is that the list was the original one from January, and many
entries from that list are now stale (the new contents were appended at
the end).
I hit ctrl-c once I realized the mistake, and I'm going to wait a while
for the current batch of bugs to get handled.
I can actually batch invalidate all of them. This will generate some
further bug spam (I apologize), but can save your time dealing with the
mess. Please let me know what's your preference.
Paweł
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 203 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread