From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Time based retirements
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:19:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1356077945.2133.27.camel@belkin4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFWqQMQ+W=h_0rZ2oABgk=sYGArCYxxa7=4uzbAtdYhSa+veBw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 968 bytes --]
El jue, 20-12-2012 a las 21:21 -0600, Doug Goldstein escribió:
> I'm curious who had the brain dead idea to retire Gentoo developers
> that are still interested in the distro, that maintain low activity
> packages for herds that are stretched way too thin, and are still
> contributing to the distro in many ways other than direct CVS commits
> (e.g. overlays, user support, providing hardware to other devs, etc).
>
> I could MAYBE understand it if they're consuming some valuable
> resource that we need to free up by retiring them. But instead they
> get a nasty-gram about their impending retirement and decide if that's
> how they are to be treated that they can be retired. When they finally
> want to contribute again they have the lovely uphill of our dreadfully
> painful recruitment process.
>
> I'm really just trying to understand the sense in this.
I have just explained it at:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101792#c17
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-21 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-21 3:21 [gentoo-dev] Time based retirements Doug Goldstein
2012-12-21 3:26 ` Peter Stuge
2012-12-21 3:33 ` Rich Freeman
2012-12-21 4:23 ` Peter Stuge
2012-12-21 4:31 ` Peter Stuge
2012-12-21 6:09 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2012-12-21 10:38 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-21 16:16 ` Peter Stuge
2012-12-21 16:57 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2012-12-22 7:14 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-12-21 3:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Matt Turner
2012-12-21 5:30 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2012-12-21 8:25 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-12-21 8:33 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2012-12-21 8:49 ` Brian Dolbec
2012-12-21 10:46 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-21 15:22 ` Brian Dolbec
2012-12-21 22:50 ` Peter Stuge
2012-12-22 1:05 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-23 2:06 ` Doug Goldstein
2012-12-23 9:39 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-23 11:57 ` Rich Freeman
2012-12-21 8:18 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-12-21 8:19 ` Pacho Ramos [this message]
2012-12-21 9:21 ` Markos Chandras
2012-12-21 12:06 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-12-21 12:32 ` Arun Raghavan
2012-12-21 12:36 ` Arun Raghavan
2012-12-21 12:57 ` Rich Freeman
2013-01-07 15:07 ` Marijn
2012-12-26 17:46 ` Alec Warner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1356077945.2133.27.camel@belkin4 \
--to=pacho@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox