From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519491381F3 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0556121C072; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D23221C026 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (70.Red-2-137-55.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.55.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A816A33BF00 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20121118082718.GA24801@kroah.com> References: <20120505010529.GD22763@kroah.com> <20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com> <4bdd949a377d40eb85590870be440551@HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu> <50A8943E.7070607@gentoo.org> <20121118080845.GA8628@kroah.com> <50A897E0.4080404@gentoo.org> <20121118081921.GB24540@kroah.com> <20121118082718.GA24801@kroah.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MLeHcT3Fj/uV30TnKPQ9" Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:38:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1353227901.3059.1.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 5e79de32-ace7-40de-a386-d996d08b561c X-Archives-Hash: 8faf3cc79cf91bcd3e6c54485b140e55 --=-MLeHcT3Fj/uV30TnKPQ9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El dom, 18-11-2012 a las 00:27 -0800, Greg KH escribi=C3=B3: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:19:21AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:10:08AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: > > > You are the one claiming that this is our official fork. None of us a= re. > >=20 > > It's on the Gentoo github site, and it has the Gentoo Foundation > > copyright all over all of the files in one of the branches, reviewed by > > you. > >=20 > > I think I would be pretty foolish if I somehow thought it was _not_ an > > official fork :) >=20 > Oh, and the README file says it is a Gentoo project: > This is a Gentoo sponsored project and testing is currently > being done with openrc. However, we aim to be distro neutral > and welcome contribution from others using a variety of system > initializations. We also aim towards POSIX compliance. >=20 > So why would I think otherwise? >=20 > thanks, >=20 > greg k-h >=20 >=20 Looks like we think different about what a "Gentoo project" means, lets read: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/herds-and-projects/index.html That would explain why both, eudev and systemd "Gentoo projects" can coexist: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/systemd/index.xml --=-MLeHcT3Fj/uV30TnKPQ9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlConn0ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9RPZwCffEA3Z4t+3s3D3uNn4xJDTUbh +TAAmQFA99HdS354Py1IbMnjoGorAjPj =Pi0y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MLeHcT3Fj/uV30TnKPQ9--