Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About unresolved bugs assigned to voip for ages

[Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1526 bytes --]

El mié, 10-10-2012 a las 20:11 -0400, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) escribió:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> <chithanh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> >>>>>> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga,
> >>>>>> opal, yate... are completely unattended by voip team for
> >>>>>> years. If nobody from that team is willing to maintain
> >>>>>> them, please move them to maintainer-needed to, at least,
> >>>>>> reflect reality.
> >
> >> Any news here? I can move that packages to maintainer-needed if you
> >> send me the list of packages you don't want to maintain. Also,
> >> maybe telepathy stuff could be moved to its own herd (that is
> >> basically gnome team + tester... or maybe tester could join gnome
> >> team ;))
> >
> > There is now one proxy maintainer for a couple of packages, he is
> > currently waiting for voip overlay access in bug 437538. He will take
> > care of linphone and related packages (see bug 399735 and its
> > dependencies).
> >
> > Regarding the packages that can be moved to maintainer-needed: I think
> > a good heuristic is if the package has several open bugs with no
> > maintainer reaction, and hasn't been touched by anyone from voip herd
> > in over a year. This would include the ekiga, opal and yate packages
> > mentioned above.
> >
> I'd gladly take maintainership of opal and ekiga, if nobody wants them.
> 
> Cheers,
> 

Would be nice as they need a lot of bumps and pending work 


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]