El jue, 13-09-2012 a las 03:43 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:53:20 +0200
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > > You can un-CC yourself. I don't see why security@ should be doing
> > > the legwork.
> >
> > It shouldn't be so hard to do, they can do it just when they CC
> > arches, instead of relaying some random team member to do it himself
> > once a useless message is received
> 
> It does become a chore when you have to check a list to match various
> CC'd people's preferences and decide whether to un-CC them based on
> that, the way they were CC'd (did they do it themselves, were they CC'd
> by security, and so on) and perhaps some other factors someone will no
> doubt soon propose in this thread.
> 
> Basically you are saying, "why doesn't anyone else do my volunteer work
> for me".
> 
> 
>      jer
> 
> 

I am not saying that, you can see who CCed them in history and most of
times was security team who CCed them... anyway, per my just replied
mail to Sean, I think we could reach a good compromise. What I don't
understand is why you think I am trying to say that thing when I ever
wasn't sure if maintainers were allowed to unCC themselves when they
think