From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71109138010 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E42321C035; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3309021C005 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.106] (modemcable154.55-37-24.static.videotron.ca [24.37.55.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tester) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 549A633C559 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1347308770.2027.1.camel@TesterTop4> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: netplugd and ifplugd support in OpenRc From: Olivier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cr=EAte?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:26:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120910144832.GA22292@linux1> References: <20120910144832.GA22292@linux1> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Nf62E0oLUnHlwzZtD77J" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3 (3.4.3-2.fc17) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 17e6e0e9-a70e-406b-bb67-5c5de045b737 X-Archives-Hash: eb905d053846e41f38b3872c71c99f98 --=-Nf62E0oLUnHlwzZtD77J Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 09:48 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > In researching this program, I have found that it and ifplugd, which is > the alternative, have been unmaintained for years. Also Debian has > declared netplugd to be obsolete in favor of ifplugd. >=20 > Does anyone have any thoughts about whether we should keep OpenRC > support for one or both of these? The ifplugd author recommends you use NetworkManager for dynamic networking scenarios. --=20 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer --=-Nf62E0oLUnHlwzZtD77J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlBOTOIACgkQHTiOWk7Zors7SACeKophQDLDpSzuHL4hR4uD1poX /aMAnRoRdCAhNyrWEGvbL41ziCOVWsSu =Bw4u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Nf62E0oLUnHlwzZtD77J--