From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3792E138010 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46BC2E05ED; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F306E058E for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.43] (unknown [96.231.195.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tetromino) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DC4333D744 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1345830614.9332.38.camel@rook> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: OpenRC network provides revisited From: Alexandre Rostovtsev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:50:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120824171010.GA27765@linux1> References: <20120824171010.GA27765@linux1> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OOlk5NIOBXpyFnhTttnd" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: a428fd15-1a04-4909-bf3a-52f991bddc29 X-Archives-Hash: 33defdfdcf31afcd032f17ccf735fc48 --=-OOlk5NIOBXpyFnhTttnd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 12:10 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > The second question this bug brings up is whether services should "need" > or "use" net. Remember that the "need" dependency will try to run the > needed service even if it is in init.d but not in a runlevel. Presumably that depends on the service. If a daemon can deal with network interfaces going up and down, then "use net" of course makes more sense. > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D425130 The bug report was caused by a failure of communication on our part; we cannot expect average users to read the gentoo-dev mailing list. Maybe there should have been a news item about the change in behavior in openrc-0.9.9. -Alexandre. --=-OOlk5NIOBXpyFnhTttnd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJQN77WAAoJEJ0WA1zPCt1hW4YH/3MCiKu/Bul6O3TAaJW7D2Pl dLFioOhXJ2XndXfgEt1l9kuRixwehoP39hE00T0jh7SwarNZx4R91IRlhMiI4ufj 0xFz7v1FVzfxx90pzb0j2HQ01CfLyLcg4IUr071ZsByNFrd74a8Uzr7f6h0CNY/3 gRIGgxhMZ7CQa7prSHCSYp8bwENAqRX+pq+xeaNM/y4YZmTOjghaCjnVZ3EUTQPD +eLv5SQjcDxpXtXghcyCw3aenS+Zo74rQxfON07fW6QI6FDAbHRPp84TFxBtVVM+ 8l28CRtqiXBVRzZCissco9Ku6Y/7tuotwDJYkYkrVqQfYpa2TC7Ec6d1O1P90xs= =Ii+F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-OOlk5NIOBXpyFnhTttnd--