From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BED13800E for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94C8CE077C; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302B1E076F for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.96.0.60] (palm-64-28-152-140.palm.com [64.28.152.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tester) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5B801B4014 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1344278457.24762.4.camel@TesterTop4> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] systemd.eclass: Patch for new function systemd_get_udevdir() From: Olivier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cr=EAte?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:40:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20120806182826.GA49719@gentoo.org> References: <501F95A8.6070105@gentoo.org> <20120806122025.27faf285@pomiocik.lan> <501F9E83.2010509@gentoo.org> <20120806104208.GH24104@gentoo.org> <20120806115620.GA10705@gentoo.org> <1344277012.24762.3.camel@TesterTop4> <20120806182826.GA49719@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dNKfuLH1LTa523JeX2BJ" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3 (3.4.3-2.fc17) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: c8f6b65e-ecf3-4761-8543-22788e78406d X-Archives-Hash: ee82be557bb1e54b789d9c9c589c33d5 --=-dNKfuLH1LTa523JeX2BJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 20:28 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 06-08-2012 11:16:52 -0700, Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 13:56 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > While OpenRC is likely perfectly capable of starting/stopping daemons= as > > > a normal user (with some tweaks), I expect systemd replacing init, to > > > already have a fair bit of isssues with being just a normal unprivile= ged > > > user. I may be wrong, of course. However, the notorious reputation = of > > > that piece of software aiming for system-domination doesn't really ma= ke > > > it sound to me like it ever will be a good match for Prefix. > >=20 > > You happen to be wrong. systemd runs perfectly as non-pid-1. Part of > > Lennart's well published plan for world domination is to use systemd as > > a session manager, so it would replace gnome-session, etc. Lennart & > > friends are currently pushing kernel patches to make it fully recursive > > (such as being able to re-parent orphaned processes to the session's > > systemd instead of the global one. >=20 > Good to know that I'm wrong. I didn't know they pursued world > domination too. I wonder how "kernel patches" go well together with > "being in an environment unknown to you, or that you cannot control at > all", though. Seems there is interest for it to support Prefix then. > Looking forward to patches and solutions to complement the challenges of > this year's GSoC task. I think they only want to support systemd-in-systemd, not systemd-in-random-init-system. --=20 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer --=-dNKfuLH1LTa523JeX2BJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlAgD7kACgkQHTiOWk7ZorvTLgCeKVn9miBX6ok5xBEOlNH2rS8+ oCIAn3oYkuot4MdwKnhJfrf4Vii1Wzpp =HgyJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dNKfuLH1LTa523JeX2BJ--