From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C2A13800E for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 07:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D6D6E05ED; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 07:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973C9E0517 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 07:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (134.Red-2-137-36.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.36.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 401B81B4063 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 07:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-misc/quagga needs help From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <500DCB6E.7000303@flameeyes.eu> References: <1343067957.26558.4.camel@belkin4> <20120723211052.28780.qmail@stuge.se> <500DCB6E.7000303@flameeyes.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mFzql+EJqtO0aXjSDWWf" Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:21:09 +0200 Message-ID: <1343114469.2180.0.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: d57f5c8f-7772-49c9-9922-9daa6c41cc3c X-Archives-Hash: 659be22f73afb716c404ce88e0aa4876 --=-mFzql+EJqtO0aXjSDWWf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 23-07-2012 a las 15:08 -0700, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 escribi=C3=B3= : > Il 23/07/2012 14:10, Peter Stuge ha scritto: > > Did anyone report it upstream? >=20 > Not me ... because I wouldn't know which one to care about. The problem > with upstream is that you have what they call master that is not really > stable, then what they call 'Release Engineering' that looks like a > kernel stable branch but they introduce new features there (instead of > master) first. >=20 > Then there is the concept that they don't really care about doing new > releases to fix build or run failures because they say that's what > integrators and distributors should be paid to deal with. >=20 > I agree with you, I'd rather run bird. >=20 Will probably treeclean it in the next days if nobody is able to bump it and make it buildable then, as looks like bird can be a good replacement --=-mFzql+EJqtO0aXjSDWWf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlAOTOUACgkQCaWpQKGI+9RYEgCfX3w37467J0bnTPg0oyfkLRUS 7rkAn3mACRRlR/aydX0VGLCBdYqcbo+N =m2WJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mFzql+EJqtO0aXjSDWWf--