From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SpAIJ-0008L6-H7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:42:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 982BCE05FA; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCC4E050C for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.210] (unknown [24.86.176.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dolsen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEB151B4018 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1342064464.14617.7.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: udev-rules.eclass From: Brian Dolbec To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:41:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20120711234808.GB27226@linux1> References: <20120711191142.GA26844@linux1> <20120711165911.1428ddb6@gentoo.org> <20120711234808.GB27226@linux1> Organization: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FRFAQJUvT0kFlDpjd3Rv" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: c2a44d5f-f3e9-4250-99bf-c6e0a4a8559f X-Archives-Hash: 589028ff5ecef6a8b17d1d03579743d6 --=-FRFAQJUvT0kFlDpjd3Rv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 18:48 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > How do you plan to handle the following:=20 > > - foo installs an udev rule > > - install foo with old udev > > - upgrade udev > >=20 > > are rules installed by foo used by new udev ? >=20 > No, they wouldn't be; that is a good reason to question the value of the > eclass itself. Maybe the correct way to do this is to forget the eclass > and just file bugs against packages that break having them move their > rules to the new location and set a dependency on the newer udev. >=20 > This would have to be a rev bump for the broken packages. >=20 > William >=20 > >=20 > > A. > >=20 So, does that mean the rule itself changes or just the location change is needed? If it is just a location change, a fairly simple udev-updater script would do it. If the pkg needs to be re-compiled to work with/depend on the new udev, then a more complex script would be needed. One more along the line of python-updater/perl-cleaner. --=20 Brian Dolbec --=-FRFAQJUvT0kFlDpjd3Rv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJP/kdQAAoJECIU2QoBTxfLo3UIAI945ZptmqYWo8FHmAl9TK3D Wlu/phkeN960iyXnlJH7WzlcVabzYvCbheVY9Do5Sdy/zmgmVqohicVA40j1iAQZ 0S1EsImwdWYQmr2bO7Zbfrv1afWQjIJ+htTxi5CcfjCrwrJL8D/91SVMH6YI+pCR pv4GQBnQE+wYLXrvYgmtoVQ5/RfxAfHHtwFBPHvO7PQmBOwEzl34+8Ti8PF69Fyg pb2eWeqW0H3Vht0kYRnWe7MEkGw7mIHC+vCvwpk474C7jiVRXqGnCpIt1MmGzfhd PTv9wSHvBVq0RTyRhtHD8PO4Kj48hO+Z+0eLth81u8QWXasIDoyNjOBdPlhshq4= =N+63 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FRFAQJUvT0kFlDpjd3Rv--