From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SiPZ4-0004Js-6f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:35:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF93DE08F8; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4AAE0A85 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (132.Red-2-137-17.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.17.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86D361B4024 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] My wishlist for EAPI 5 From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20120623131633.212a8d35@googlemail.com> References: <20120621080039.0724cf8d@googlemail.com> <1340263510.2470.18.camel@belkin4> <20120621083945.345d661a@googlemail.com> <1340438017.5979.11.camel@belkin4> <20120623103833.6b9cb91e@googlemail.com> <20120623095326.25423.qmail@stuge.se> <1340447072.5979.33.camel@belkin4> <20120623113125.656d26c4@googlemail.com> <1340449551.5979.43.camel@belkin4> <20120623121422.6d47683a@googlemail.com> <20120623113809.1641.qmail@stuge.se> <20120623123759.03d19277@googlemail.com> <1340453488.5979.65.camel@belkin4> <20120623131633.212a8d35@googlemail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X7sllinNKVn41NOPmIUi" Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:33:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1340454818.5979.70.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 27ec09a2-f68b-426a-a5d7-3e5ecf33aa59 X-Archives-Hash: 1a3ceb73007bbb69e844177aeb8b283a --=-X7sllinNKVn41NOPmIUi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El s=C3=A1b, 23-06-2012 a las 13:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribi=C3=B3: > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:11:28 +0200 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Looks like you have now opted to use Brian's comment as a kind of > > "shield" of similar and discuss only about multilib, even when this > > thread was more general and we were talking to the problems shown in > > recent discussions (from forcing rebuilds issue, optional deps > > problems to some trivial questions like know where we can see what > > things are being worked out for eapi5).=20 >=20 > For optional deps, we're close to having two proposals. That's moving > forwards. Whether or not it will be in EAPI 5 depends solely upon > timing, and whether the Council ends up liking at least one of the two > proposals. >=20 > For "forced rebuilds", there's a proposal already, and Zac has just > done implementation work, and most of the PMS patch was written ages > ago for kdebuild-1 and the original EAPI 3. So again, whether or not > that ends up in EAPI 5 is just a matter of timing and Council approval. >=20 > For "what's being worked on", you just need to look at the PMS list. >=20 > So I'm really not sure what your problem is there... >=20 Your cynicism, that is the problem I see --=-X7sllinNKVn41NOPmIUi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk/lt6IACgkQCaWpQKGI+9SyuQCeIk9F+bezsVg9FA3+oi57jd4J oQgAoISePBRJFF73uatIf+z4SZNGh5Gz =sDUT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X7sllinNKVn41NOPmIUi--