From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Schy2-00071i-Pt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:01:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BD4DE0540; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78300E0512 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.204] (23.155.16.95.dynamic.jazztel.es [95.16.155.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EEBB1B4016 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20120607194448.1577119e@googlemail.com> References: <4FCF2012.3040500@gentoo.org> <1338976106.2706.36.camel@belkin4> <20120606181650.0c727f18@googlemail.com> <1339005744.2706.47.camel@belkin4> <20120606191505.4e011158@googlemail.com> <1339007452.2706.57.camel@belkin4> <20120606193348.67b83427@googlemail.com> <1339010165.2706.62.camel@belkin4> <20120606202340.6c95711f@googlemail.com> <4FCFF945.1070804@gentoo.org> <20120607082409.GB3352@localhost.google.com> <4FD0DA34.8080409@gentoo.org> <20120607184008.09aca0fe@googlemail.com> <4FD0ECED.10201@gentoo.org> <1339092995.3014.23.camel@belkin4> <1339094634.3014.24.camel@belkin4> <20120607194448.1577119e@googlemail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KcJUZTquzQ6R+jDJHaus" Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:00:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1339095641.3014.26.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 8654c1a2-c6f0-4cf7-940a-024cb1267aeb X-Archives-Hash: 1ae4bacd7e98f3149e2ea37b8962b8bb --=-KcJUZTquzQ6R+jDJHaus Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribi=C3=B3: > On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:43:54 +0200 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > I would prefer, as a workaround, allow reverse deps to RDEPEND on > > > glib:2.* instead. That way it would cover more cases when more than > > > two slots are available > >=20 > > Well, per: > > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=3Dproj/pms.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;= h=3Df9f7729c047300e1924ad768a49c660e12c2f906;hp=3Db7750e67b4772c1064543defb= 7df6a556f09807b > >=20 > > looks like "*" usage for SLOTs would be allowed :), or I am > > misinterpreting it? >=20 > It's not a wildcard. >=20 But it looks like a valid usage for cases like glib vs. dbus-glib/gobject-introspection I have exposed as example, and also allows us to keep "SLOT" over "ABI_SLOT" (at least for this case, not sure about others I could be missing now...) --=-KcJUZTquzQ6R+jDJHaus Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk/Q+lkACgkQCaWpQKGI+9So1wCfVUBOrTToGtKhMnO1enfCX3Ua HwoAn3B71sTUqs+qbwneeyCC0gMMDXMV =R/az -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KcJUZTquzQ6R+jDJHaus--