From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ScBuB-0007Ae-3S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:47:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 115F2E068F; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A162EE066E for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.204] (23.155.16.95.dynamic.jazztel.es [95.16.155.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86AE61B402F for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4FCEBDD9.8000604@gentoo.org> References: <1338845178.23212.1.camel@belkin4> <4FCDFF18.3080600@gentoo.org> <4FCEA99E.4090700@gentoo.org> <4FCEBDD9.8000604@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-l8Ufag1vsSUIOaZEmICe" Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:46:15 +0200 Message-ID: <1338972375.2706.23.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: f0141ba5-5984-4e3a-8c88-b7f3710d27ac X-Archives-Hash: 98565812883a9a5df5b84ab2c5193bae --=-l8Ufag1vsSUIOaZEmICe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribi=C3=B3: > On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote: > > Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with > > revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages > > with tests)? >=20 > I'd suggest a special ebuild phase to check for ABI changes, like the > pre_pkg_preinst_abi_check phase suggested here: >=20 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D192319#c20 I guess, that phase would detect ABI change and package manager would know how to handle it by itself? --=-l8Ufag1vsSUIOaZEmICe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk/PGNcACgkQCaWpQKGI+9TUJQCeKFJKDwwL5s+L/ASmB8osTh/O NskAnA70r/lZqKFSMeVWfqz8QTlNpSHx =oFfV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-l8Ufag1vsSUIOaZEmICe--