From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SXReX-0006lB-BG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:36:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57260E0A5F; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248A3E09D7 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (58.Red-2-136-130.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.136.130.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB2581B4010 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org> <8bffce1d7a3a27b850b65f461f914ae0@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru> <4FBD2088.5040302@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2KBDKsDbt/gBf/ukemiQ" Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 08:34:37 +0200 Message-ID: <1337841278.8478.0.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 261fcb30-7b5d-4adb-b650-12099b925338 X-Archives-Hash: 8b49c4294573e2bd705fb143b7890af4 --=-2KBDKsDbt/gBf/ukemiQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mi=C3=A9, 23-05-2012 a las 17:00 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia escribi=C3=B3: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Arun Raghavan = wrote: > > I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git > > Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init systems > > and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, and it's > > good enough for you. >=20 >=20 > Perhaps it would be instructive if you could tell us one advantage of > cvs over git. >=20 > (This is me exposing me to your terrible dev-flames, I was feeling too co= ld ;) >=20 >=20 I think Arun's comment was sarcastic ;) I guess that cvsserver bug can be dropped from blockers, no? Now, the other pending blockers... :( --=-2KBDKsDbt/gBf/ukemiQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+91n0ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9QuRgCdFgf5dI7JJZiud0U5tI7vCuTa 0AoAnjD0jX06MjgyPaKO8rZUAP/1IV01 =7uPQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2KBDKsDbt/gBf/ukemiQ--