From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SU0P2-00040m-N0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 18:53:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4D32E0AB5; Mon, 14 May 2012 18:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA10E0A94 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 18:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (14.Red-2-137-38.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.38.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D91DF1BC0D2 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 18:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by trapni need a co-maintainer From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4FA6A91D.9010105@gentoo.org> References: <1334402197.3181.4.camel@belkin4> <4F895E69.2000305@gentoo.org> <20120415170947.73961f87@jesper.s.riegger.name> <1336318523.2625.5.camel@belkin4> <4FA6A91D.9010105@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Z2Njnz4mr21aRnBPkuCz" Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 20:51:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1337021501.19402.14.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 6c01ee0f-d9ff-458d-9799-df402a0d3b0c X-Archives-Hash: 799c93765607bb3c2f568e0fb72f10fa --=-Z2Njnz4mr21aRnBPkuCz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El dom, 06-05-2012 a las 18:38 +0200, Michael Weber escribi=C3=B3: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 >=20 > On 05/06/2012 05:35 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Well, in tree versions are still buggy and outdated, I would vote > > for either: 1. Mask them for removal (server is already hardmasked, > > but client not). 2. Proxy maintain them if anyone volunteers. >=20 > I would proxy maintain. >=20 > Feel free to send me a pm on #irc.freenode.net, user xmw. >=20 > Michael >=20 Not sure how this ended finally :-/ Thanks for the news :) --=-Z2Njnz4mr21aRnBPkuCz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+xVD0ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9QqEACfb7KDQTyEPS/2F+wv1E5UIwa6 Y24An2gMMiTGg8DbLKQ/a4+z+Z2JgJoj =7AIP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Z2Njnz4mr21aRnBPkuCz--