From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SRXBe-0006PG-9W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 23:17:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DE50E0B38; Mon, 7 May 2012 23:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DAEE0B23 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 23:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.134] (modemcable154.55-37-24.static.videotron.ca [24.37.55.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tester) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C52364272 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 23:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1336432601.21435.0.camel@TesterTop4> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code From: Olivier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cr=EAte?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 19:16:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120507222314.GA16470@waltdnes.org> References: <4F9E44D0.70002@linx.net> <201205031918.48928.vapier@gentoo.org> <4FA32795.6000809@gentoo.org> <201205032122.12231.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120504213546.GA8823@waltdnes.org> <4FA44FA1.4060101@gentoo.org> <20120505005945.GB22763@kroah.com> <20120507222314.GA16470@waltdnes.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+INM/PqvAe3XDfFR0A9V" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.1 (3.4.1-2.fc17) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 926382a7-9306-4dd8-832f-a905852c41f8 X-Archives-Hash: 9963045ff4ec9837d8678133fe595dc4 --=-+INM/PqvAe3XDfFR0A9V Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 18:23 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 05:59:45PM -0700, Greg KH wrote > > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:52:33PM -0700, Luca Barbato wrote: > > > On 04/05/12 14:35, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > > What could work is a shim or compatability layer that gets > > > > called, and pre-processes requests and forwards them to mdev. > > >=20 > > > That's my idea =3D) > >=20 > > and then, look, you have reimplemented udev. > >=20 > > {sigh} >=20 > Actually, more like what udev *USED TO BE*, namely a simple devicei > manager. Maybe Greg understands how udev was and how it should be better than you do, since he wrote it. --=20 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer --=-+INM/PqvAe3XDfFR0A9V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+oV9kACgkQHTiOWk7ZorsbAgCdGPWBQ70L7ugBuaXkBklL+xHu W28AnigiSJFg2otx0tphBco+7+HVBdsy =2s1O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+INM/PqvAe3XDfFR0A9V--