From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SOSdC-0004jZ-UX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:49:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6033E06BF; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675B3E068C for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (58.Red-83-33-96.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.33.96.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D178E1B4003; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-embedded/tigcc needs an urgent bump From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: dev-embedded@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1335206106.8517.2.camel@belkin4> References: <1335206106.8517.2.camel@belkin4> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-IapF/GhgOJeh9nfor40t" Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:48:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1335700125.18263.1.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 150df6ef-6538-4731-b0dd-e81e4ebb48ac X-Archives-Hash: 9648e746590815aec719b7cc384e3cb5 --=-IapF/GhgOJeh9nfor40t Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 20:35 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribi=C3=B3: > Our stable versions are broken for a long time, they even don't compile, > but we cannot stable latest testing version because of a buffer overflow > problem. A bump could help, but looks like embedded team doesn't have > enough time for it. Is anybody interested in taking care of it? >=20 > Its bugs: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=3Dtigcc&list_id=3D978701 >=20 > Thanks Or maybe we should simply treeclean it if nobody is willing to fix/maintain it and since nothing in the tree needs it... --=-IapF/GhgOJeh9nfor40t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+dKp0ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9S7mgCePZoXkVg/NVmiT8XhY8MqD/oQ K+kAoID093tWAWzTLAMf+de53xtXNUkm =BlSl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-IapF/GhgOJeh9nfor40t--