From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SMjyJ-0007h3-7e for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:56:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55FF1E0CF2; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0A4E0BBB for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.2] (graaff.xs4all.nl [80.101.101.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: graaff) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA5661B4018 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1335290093.12361.2.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors From: Hans de Graaff To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:54:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120424130959.GB13543@falgoret> References: <20120424130959.GB13543@falgoret> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FqzPnJn+tbvmpL3qmd3d" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 68e2f299-16ec-4961-b82c-79b55f6e27b5 X-Archives-Hash: 2cecafa954cc680f85f247ca2e6f8e73 --=-FqzPnJn+tbvmpL3qmd3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 15:10 +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: > And here are some mirrors that can be deduced from that (except freebsd-j= p > which I found reading the linphone ebuild): >=20 > xemacs http://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/ ftp://ftp.sa.xemacs.org/pub/ I only consider the first site to be a reliable source for the packages, and this is what the eclass provides (only 4 packages actually provide a SRC_URI, all others are handled through the eclass). Kind regards, Hans --=-FqzPnJn+tbvmpL3qmd3d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iF4EABEIAAYFAk+W6PMACgkQiIP6VqMIqNfV9wD/RmlD0UPKNY6PdqJSv89dPXPV aucQKmGQbJNzOtzVm9YA/RwQAPQmYx6jI2bJ0w6jM9Z86ZJJ4oeU8jwV2W1SRM0l =9eHb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FqzPnJn+tbvmpL3qmd3d--