[gentoo-dev] dev-embedded/tigcc needs an urgent bump

[gentoo-dev] dev-embedded/tigcc needs an urgent bump

[Pacho Ramos]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 377 bytes --]

Our stable versions are broken for a long time, they even don't compile,
but we cannot stable latest testing version because of a buffer overflow
problem. A bump could help, but looks like embedded team doesn't have
enough time for it. Is anybody interested in taking care of it?

Its bugs:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tigcc&list_id=978701

Thanks

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-embedded/tigcc needs an urgent bump

[Pacho Ramos]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 584 bytes --]

El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 20:35 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> Our stable versions are broken for a long time, they even don't compile,
> but we cannot stable latest testing version because of a buffer overflow
> problem. A bump could help, but looks like embedded team doesn't have
> enough time for it. Is anybody interested in taking care of it?
> 
> Its bugs:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tigcc&list_id=978701
> 
> Thanks

Or maybe we should simply treeclean it if nobody is willing to
fix/maintain it and since nothing in the tree needs it...


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-embedded/tigcc needs an urgent bump

[Chris Reffett]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/29/12 07:48, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 20:35 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
>> Our stable versions are broken for a long time, they even don't compile,
>> but we cannot stable latest testing version because of a buffer overflow
>> problem. A bump could help, but looks like embedded team doesn't have
>> enough time for it. Is anybody interested in taking care of it?
>>
>> Its bugs:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tigcc&list_id=978701
>>
>> Thanks
>
> Or maybe we should simply treeclean it if nobody is willing to
> fix/maintain it and since nothing in the tree needs it...
>
I've submitted what I hope is fix for the buffer overflow problem to bug
337059. Will that be sufficient to remove the block on stabilization?
- --Chris Reffett
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+dm5gACgkQ23laikJhg1Q2aQCeOOHS3tB0gVfCxQ79ldSBMV3N
gEYAn3Ek1hpIhU/CSjsLxMEa13bx8R0t
=0uOv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----