From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SKR0n-0007Uz-5f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:17:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29F0FE0DD4; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830EAE0AED for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (69.Red-2-137-38.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.38.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 246081B4008 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About adding a way to check for bugs referring to no longer existing packages in the tree From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1334565624.2668.1.camel@belkin4> References: <1334401347.3181.2.camel@belkin4> <20120414124245.323cba48@gentoo.org> <1334426068.3181.11.camel@belkin4> <20120415024729.52e5d909@gentoo.org> <1334483704.2557.3.camel@belkin4> <20120416030401.16d3efeb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <1334565624.2668.1.camel@belkin4> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Z7AUdEGHMp41rbthpErd" Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:15:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1334740526.4993.6.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: c818e251-4e54-4ef7-a7c0-70625f540beb X-Archives-Hash: 417f697c1ca26f579af15a3895fc05c7 --=-Z7AUdEGHMp41rbthpErd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 10:40 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribi=C3=B3: > El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 03:04 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribi=C3=B3: > > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200 > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > >=20 > > > Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would > > > be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bu= g > > > summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by > > > this, but we would still be able to easily check for obsolete bug > > > reports). > >=20 > > I only started fixing summaries to include valid, canonical > > cat/pkg[-ver] strings a few years ago because searching for a full > > atom in bugzilla's search would otherwise (and still does) fail. > >=20 > > Before that it was mayhem, and it's mainly the older bugs you appear be > > worried about. Having a list of bugs to fix the cat/pkg for would have > > more uses than the one you're interested in. > >=20 > >=20 > > jer > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > I obviously agree, but both suggestions are not mutually exclusive I > think :) This is another example I hit today: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247750 that would benefit from this QA report --=-Z7AUdEGHMp41rbthpErd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+Ohi4ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9RtrACcD5jBGt1JwUUPNIccB/Mbwu4t IaEAmwfOiQnP9bQEjKpr5KzarWp+Og1v =9T+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Z7AUdEGHMp41rbthpErd--