From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SJi2n-0006SW-06 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:16:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5D4FE0C3C; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45211E0C15 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (253.Red-95-123-35.staticIP.rima-tde.net [95.123.35.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C4E61B408C for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by mduft need a co-maintainer From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4F8BDFB2.80208@gentoo.org> References: <1334403022.3181.8.camel@belkin4> <4F8BDFB2.80208@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-JGemLBERg85LPevOGyvr" Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:14:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1334567662.2668.2.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 04893e53-7b99-4dd0-acf5-507d5e318b1d X-Archives-Hash: 0c95e75592d7f04a7fcdf67772cd4718 --=-JGemLBERg85LPevOGyvr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 11:00 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > On 04/14/2012 01:30 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Due long devaway, his packages need a co-maintainer, feel free to add t= o > > metadata if you want. Thanks: > > app-portage/prefix-chain-setup > > sys-apps/prefix-chain-utils >=20 > Even if prefix-chaining most likely is broken ATM in prefix-portage, > (IMO) they still belong to prefix herd. Why have they shown up at all? >=20 I probably missed prefix there when running epkginfo -Hm over mduft packages > > sys-libs/suacomp > > sys-devel/parity > > sys-libs/itx-bind >=20 > Added myself, target Interix/Windows only. > Not sure if we can/want/should take them to prefix herd. >=20 > > net-proxy/cntlm >=20 > Still open. >=20 > /haubi/ >=20 >=20 --=-JGemLBERg85LPevOGyvr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+L4u4ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9QdXACghmxxJ7HC65/K23sGDCVsN7qf EU0An0rm/URfs3dJ9RYwYUFK4G4CpVvZ =fF6n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-JGemLBERg85LPevOGyvr--