From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50998-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SJhVh-0001dp-LV
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:42:09 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D845E0EB6;
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:41:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C822BE0EA6
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:40:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (253.Red-95-123-35.staticIP.rima-tde.net [95.123.35.253])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: pacho)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92D9B1B4007
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:40:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About adding a way to check for bugs
referring to no longer existing packages in the tree
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20120416030401.16d3efeb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net>
References: <1334401347.3181.2.camel@belkin4>
<20120414124245.323cba48@gentoo.org> <1334426068.3181.11.camel@belkin4>
<20120415024729.52e5d909@gentoo.org> <1334483704.2557.3.camel@belkin4>
<20120416030401.16d3efeb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-A3CsRmTDMIEoGeflP5NQ"
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:40:24 +0200
Message-ID: <1334565624.2668.1.camel@belkin4>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3
X-Archives-Salt: 0b73fee6-d436-485b-897c-59fbea687fb7
X-Archives-Hash: c68f3ae62adb5d8e8039be1c09b0d981
--=-A3CsRmTDMIEoGeflP5NQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 03:04 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribi=C3=B3:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
>=20
> > Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would
> > be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug
> > summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by
> > this, but we would still be able to easily check for obsolete bug
> > reports).
>=20
> I only started fixing summaries to include valid, canonical
> cat/pkg[-ver] strings a few years ago because searching for a full
> atom in bugzilla's search would otherwise (and still does) fail.
>=20
> Before that it was mayhem, and it's mainly the older bugs you appear be
> worried about. Having a list of bugs to fix the cat/pkg for would have
> more uses than the one you're interested in.
>=20
>=20
> jer
>=20
>=20
I obviously agree, but both suggestions are not mutually exclusive I
think :)
--=-A3CsRmTDMIEoGeflP5NQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk+L2vgACgkQCaWpQKGI+9Q3TgCfaz1S/e4e0JMswqvHdhF5aWcS
VY0An2IeyJHDK/z4Qh9Q4h/GnhM2cH2c
=RPIF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-A3CsRmTDMIEoGeflP5NQ--