From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About adding a way to check for bugs referring to no longer existing packages in the tree
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:40:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334565624.2668.1.camel@belkin4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120416030401.16d3efeb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 973 bytes --]
El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 03:04 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would
> > be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug
> > summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by
> > this, but we would still be able to easily check for obsolete bug
> > reports).
>
> I only started fixing summaries to include valid, canonical
> cat/pkg[-ver] strings a few years ago because searching for a full
> atom in bugzilla's search would otherwise (and still does) fail.
>
> Before that it was mayhem, and it's mainly the older bugs you appear be
> worried about. Having a list of bugs to fix the cat/pkg for would have
> more uses than the one you're interested in.
>
>
> jer
>
>
I obviously agree, but both suggestions are not mutually exclusive I
think :)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-16 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-14 11:02 [gentoo-dev] About adding a way to check for bugs referring to no longer existing packages in the tree Pacho Ramos
2012-04-14 15:42 ` Alexis Ballier
2012-04-14 17:54 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-04-15 8:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2012-04-15 9:55 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-04-15 10:00 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-04-15 10:21 ` Ryan Hill
2012-04-16 1:04 ` Jeroen Roovers
2012-04-16 1:39 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-16 8:40 ` Pacho Ramos [this message]
2012-04-18 9:15 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-04-15 15:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Marcin Mirosław
2012-04-15 16:09 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-04-15 16:10 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-04-15 16:30 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-04-15 16:46 ` Marcin Mirosław
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334565624.2668.1.camel@belkin4 \
--to=pacho@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox