From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SJSo8-0004rH-2I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:00:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4D25E0CAA; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B98E0B94 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (156.Red-2-137-14.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.14.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F6B31B4028 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4F8556BC.6070306@gentoo.org> References: <1334041139.25951.7.camel@belkin4> <4F83DD50.5000803@gentoo.org> <1334089280.25951.8.camel@belkin4> <20120411001255.2829e937@gentoo.org> <4F8556BC.6070306@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-E0K9zER5L7tEAXvA2oUC" Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:59:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1334509151.2557.17.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 88149182-14fe-4980-9557-43f1031b9f7a X-Archives-Hash: 7495d10e1e72fa9caf1fa2a4af41f632 --=-E0K9zER5L7tEAXvA2oUC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mi=C3=A9, 11-04-2012 a las 13:02 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribi=C3=B3: > On 04/11/2012 09:12 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:21:20 +0200 > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > >> OK, looks like I misunderstood how wxwidgets work and most opinions > >> point to enable wxwidgets by default in gnome profiles, ok with that > >> solution? > > > > As I mentioned in the bug I'd like it default for desktop. There's not= hing > > inherently "gnome" about wxwidgets other than the fact that it uses gtk= + > > widgets. If the idea is that you won't get any gui at all if wxwidgets= isn't > > enabled (and I can't think of any packages where this isn't true) then = kde > > users should be included too. > > > > >=20 > +1 >=20 > wxwidgets is not limited to gnome users, so goes to=20 > profiles/targets/desktop/make.defaults >=20 OK then to enable wxwidgets in desktop profile? --=-E0K9zER5L7tEAXvA2oUC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk+K/l8ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9QFrQCfYVx5ET4CX6JKeslgLkbUnpEm bBAAn1A08KfVI4VOMyNx4oa1P5gROckL =sJHo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-E0K9zER5L7tEAXvA2oUC--