From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SI6Xf-0007ET-Mx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:01:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81700E0D70; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7C6E0C76 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.43] (unknown [96.231.195.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tetromino) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 283B267A1D for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1334185211.20079.22.camel@rook> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] >= udev-182 tracker From: Alexandre Rostovtsev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:00:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20120411195345.GA19071@linux1> <20120411215847.6993e0a8@pomiocik.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: eb4005fd-309d-48b7-bbf0-856950f1ac60 X-Archives-Hash: 37c5403c23dfafe3f46311f515b946dc On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:53 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > Maybe we should create a new mailing list, say, > > gentoo-usr-discussion@lists.gentoo.org. >=20 > Just to clarify, you are trolling right? s/trolling/joking/ It's is not the first time I've seen the misidentification made, and I wish that people at least on this mailing list would avoid it. Trolling means deliberately derailing the discussion and wasting everyone's time by writing messages that "press people's buttons" and therefore are likely elicit angry, poorly thought out responses from the list readership. Joking, by contrast, is not designed to elicit much response beyond a ":)" or two. Instead, it is designed to make the reader chuckle - and, perhaps, think (since humor can be a good way to slip an idea past a jaded reader's mental defenses). -Alexandre.