From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SEpYP-00082Y-EN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:16:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 534BDE0B8B; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E82E0B48 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.204] (133.150.222.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.222.150.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FBE71B402F for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Doubts about need for "ewarn" when strip-linguas is used From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1331280019.2710.0.camel@belkin4> References: <1331030775.7159.4.camel@belkin4> <1331280019.2710.0.camel@belkin4> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-QUzlpBVJSwnkkD3IvKvj" Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:14:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1333404842.10130.4.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 0a83eb7e-632f-40bd-bc8d-432db5c7ea8f X-Archives-Hash: 898f6bb655be9310b266821469d8b266 --=-QUzlpBVJSwnkkD3IvKvj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 09:00 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribi=C3=B3: > El mar, 06-03-2012 a las 11:46 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribi=C3=B3: > > I usually read messages in /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log to simply > > warn me about "es es_ES" LINGUAS not being supported by that package. > > That comes from eutils.eclass inside strip-linguas: > > ewarn "Sorry, but ${PN} does not support the LINGUAS:" ${nols} > >=20 > > Is this warning really required, personally I know a lot of packages > > that don't support spanish translations and I get no warning from them > > (as they don't use strip-linguas). When I set LINGUAS variable in my > > make.conf I assume a lot of packages won't support spanish translations= , > > and I see no point on being informed about that for some packages using > > strip-linguas. > >=20 > > What do you think? >=20 > OK with dropping message completely or use "einfo" instead of "ewarn"? Just done --=-QUzlpBVJSwnkkD3IvKvj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk96JKoACgkQCaWpQKGI+9THQgCfTDSmqrHzk43wo2C7cBlNfKLI 12AAnAnsrmNvjC4Uu3uEEXNZSYYWCJIT =cvqE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QUzlpBVJSwnkkD3IvKvj--