public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:57:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1333094230.1407.4.camel@belkin4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120327180158.GA1468@siphos.be>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2393 bytes --]

Will start to reply but will take some time as I don't have much this
days :(

El mar, 27-03-2012 a las 20:01 +0200, Sven Vermeulen escribió:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to create a
> > separate partition for /usr/portage tree. I remember my first Gentoo
> > systems had it inside / and that lead to a lot of fragmentation, much
> > slower "emerge -pvuDN world" (I benchmarked it when I changed my
> > partitioning scheme to put /usr/portage) separate and a lot of disk
> > space lost (I remember portage tree reached around 3 GB of disk space
> > while I am now running with 300MB)
> > 
> > Could handbook suggest people to put /usr/portage on a different
> > partition then? The only doubt I have is what filesystem would be better
> > for it, in my case I am using reiserfs with tail enabled, but maybe you
> > have other different setups.
> 
> To be honest, I don't think it is wise to describe it in the Gentoo Handbook
> just yet. I don't mind having it documented elsewhere, but the separate
> partition is not mandatory for getting Gentoo up and running. The
> instructions currently also just give an example partition layout and tell
> users that different layouts are perfectly possible.
> 
> We need to take into consideration what is needed (must) for a Gentoo
> installation, what is seriously recommended (should), what is nice to have
> (could), etc. And for me, having a separate /usr/portage is a nice-to-have
> imo.
> 
> Wkr,
> 	Sven Vermeulen
> 
> 

My idea is to add a comment about this because it's not obvious having
portage tree in a "common" partition with the rest of the system has
some problems like high fragmentation, waste of disk space and also
performance problems. I discovered it empirically when trying to get
"emerge -pvuDN world" a bit faster. 

Also, once a partition scheme is chosen when installing Gentoo at first
time, it's sometimes difficult to modify (for example, I was luck in my
cases because I had big swap partitions I shrinked a bit for portage
tree.

You can probably see it's "nice-to-have" (as partition scheme that is
shown in handbook showing partitions for /var, /home...), but it's
better than letting people put their portage trees in a standard
partition with the rest of the system

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-30  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20337.28987.736877.961717@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
     [not found] ` <20120327154239.GA17394@gentoo.org>
2012-03-27 17:49   ` [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook Pacho Ramos
2012-03-27 18:01     ` Sven Vermeulen
2012-03-27 18:21       ` Aaron W. Swenson
2012-03-27 18:34       ` Alexandre Rostovtsev
2012-03-27 18:47         ` Rich Freeman
2012-03-27 18:53           ` Ian Stakenvicius
2012-03-27 19:02             ` vivo75
2012-03-27 19:04             ` Aaron W. Swenson
2012-03-27 19:13               ` Ian Stakenvicius
2012-03-27 19:31                 ` Aaron W. Swenson
2012-03-27 19:16             ` Kent Fredric
2012-03-30  8:00             ` Pacho Ramos
2012-03-27 19:15           ` Sven Vermeulen
2012-03-27 19:20             ` Kent Fredric
2012-03-27 19:29               ` William Hubbs
2012-03-27 19:40                 ` Sven Vermeulen
2012-03-27 19:57         ` Richard Yao
2012-03-27 20:15           ` Kent Fredric
2012-03-27 20:05         ` Alec Moskvin
2012-03-30  8:06           ` Pacho Ramos
2012-03-31  8:44             ` Sven Vermeulen
2012-03-31  9:35               ` Brian Harring
2012-03-31 13:36                 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-03-31 13:34               ` Pacho Ramos
2012-03-31 17:42                 ` Zac Medico
2012-03-31 23:25                   ` Walter Dnes
2012-04-01  0:33                     ` Zac Medico
2013-07-21 11:42                       ` Pacho Ramos
2013-07-21 11:57                         ` Michał Górny
2013-07-21 12:06                           ` Pacho Ramos
2013-07-21 12:15                             ` Michał Górny
2013-07-21 18:00                           ` Zac Medico
2013-07-21 18:55                             ` Michał Górny
2013-07-21 14:26                         ` Michael Weber
2013-07-21 14:46                           ` justin
2013-07-21 17:01                             ` Pacho Ramos
2012-04-01  8:06                     ` Pacho Ramos
2012-04-01 15:28                     ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J Long
2012-04-02  4:41                       ` Walter Dnes
2012-03-30  7:57         ` [gentoo-dev] " Pacho Ramos
2012-03-30  7:57       ` Pacho Ramos [this message]
2012-03-27 18:16     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-03-28  7:16       ` Brian Dolbec
2012-03-28 10:35         ` Rich Freeman
2012-03-28 14:53         ` Kent Fredric
2012-03-28 14:59         ` Richard Yao
2012-03-28 15:27           ` Matt Turner
2012-03-28 15:37           ` Rich Freeman
2012-03-28 18:56             ` Brian Dolbec
2012-03-28 17:41         ` Joshua Kinard
2012-03-28 22:27     ` Joshua Saddler
2012-03-29  0:35       ` Dale
2012-03-29  2:21         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2012-03-29  3:11           ` Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1333094230.1407.4.camel@belkin4 \
    --to=pacho@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox