From: Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:20:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1332426045.27053.7.camel@rook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120322134818.GN2372@ctf.aoz.ath.cx>
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 07:48 -0600, schism@subverted.org wrote:
> Normally I don't take to the skies with this sort of thing, but this was
> ridiculous. In what I am sure was a well-intentioned change, cryptsetup
> recently silently lost its default USE=static status. For one of the
> many people actually using cryptsetup in an initrd, this came as a
> lovely surprise this morning as I found my new kernel/initrd completely
> unbootable.
>
> To compound matters, udev-181's incompatibility with my old kernel (no
> DEVTMPFS, separate /usr), and my primary system was completely
> unbootable.
>
> Please - if you're going to significantly change functionality that
> (whether correct or not) people have come to depend on, have the decency
> to at least publish a news article on it. I may find 'eselect news'
> annoying, but I at least read it. Before we get to bikeshedding, I'm
> well aware there were multiple ways to have prevented this, but none of
> them were in place [1]. What was in place was default behavior that had
> been there for a very long time.
>
>
> [1] For one, genkernel should bomb out if it can't comply with a
> command-line arg instead of just putting non-alert text up.
There is already a bug open about this issue:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409277
However, I must still thank you for alerting the list about it; you
saved lots of peoples' systems (probably including mine, if I had not
read this message) from being rendered unbootable.
-Alexandre Rostovtsev.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-22 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-22 13:48 [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup schism
2012-03-22 14:20 ` Maxim Kammerer
2012-03-22 14:20 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev [this message]
2012-03-29 9:58 ` Sebastian Pipping
2012-03-29 17:59 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-03-30 7:56 ` Amadeusz Żołnowski
2012-03-30 8:05 ` Samuli Suominen
2012-04-02 0:49 ` schism
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1332426045.27053.7.camel@rook \
--to=tetromino@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox