[gentoo-dev] Doubts about need for "ewarn" when strip-linguas is used

[gentoo-dev] Doubts about need for "ewarn" when strip-linguas is used

[Pacho Ramos]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --]

I usually read messages in /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log to simply
warn me about "es es_ES" LINGUAS not being supported by that package.
That comes from eutils.eclass inside strip-linguas:
ewarn "Sorry, but ${PN} does not support the LINGUAS:" ${nols}

Is this warning really required, personally I know a lot of packages
that don't support spanish translations and I get no warning from them
(as they don't use strip-linguas). When I set LINGUAS variable in my
make.conf I assume a lot of packages won't support spanish translations,
and I see no point on being informed about that for some packages using
strip-linguas.

What do you think?

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Doubts about need for "ewarn" when strip-linguas is used

[Amadeusz Żołnowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --]

Excerpts from Pacho Ramos's message of 2012-03-06 11:46:15 +0100:
> I usually read messages in /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log to simply
> warn me about "es es_ES" LINGUAS not being supported by that package.
> That comes from eutils.eclass inside strip-linguas: ewarn "Sorry, but
> ${PN} does not support the LINGUAS:" ${nols}
> 
> Is this warning really required, personally I know a lot of packages
> that don't support spanish translations and I get no warning from them
> (as they don't use strip-linguas). When I set LINGUAS variable in my
> make.conf I assume a lot of packages won't support spanish
> translations, and I see no point on being informed about that for some
> packages using strip-linguas.
> 
> What do you think?

+1, this warning is annoying.


-- 
Amadeusz Żołnowski

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Doubts about need for "ewarn" when strip-linguas is used

["Paweł Hajdan, Jr."]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 210 bytes --]

On 3/6/12 11:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> What do you think?

I second removing a possibly spammy warning.

Maybe provide a way in the ebuild to silence it (if it makes sense), but
I'm fine either way.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 203 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Doubts about need for "ewarn" when strip-linguas is used

[Mr. Aaron W. Swenson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 682 bytes --]

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:28:23PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/6/12 11:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > What do you think?
> 
> I second removing a possibly spammy warning.
> 
> Maybe provide a way in the ebuild to silence it (if it makes sense), but
> I'm fine either way.
> 

I get the warning for 'en en_US' as well for packages that are native
English and don't need the translation. So, it doesn't actually make
sense to warn about 'en en_US' not being supported.

-- 
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux
Developer, Proxy Committer
Email    : titanofold@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C  0E31 5713 AA03 D1BB FDA0
GnuPG ID : D1BBFDA0

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 230 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Doubts about need for "ewarn" when strip-linguas is used

[Pacho Ramos]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 821 bytes --]

El mar, 06-03-2012 a las 11:46 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> I usually read messages in /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log to simply
> warn me about "es es_ES" LINGUAS not being supported by that package.
> That comes from eutils.eclass inside strip-linguas:
> ewarn "Sorry, but ${PN} does not support the LINGUAS:" ${nols}
> 
> Is this warning really required, personally I know a lot of packages
> that don't support spanish translations and I get no warning from them
> (as they don't use strip-linguas). When I set LINGUAS variable in my
> make.conf I assume a lot of packages won't support spanish translations,
> and I see no point on being informed about that for some packages using
> strip-linguas.
> 
> What do you think?

OK with dropping message completely or use "einfo" instead of "ewarn"?

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Doubts about need for "ewarn" when strip-linguas is used

[Pacho Ramos]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 928 bytes --]

El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 09:00 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El mar, 06-03-2012 a las 11:46 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > I usually read messages in /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log to simply
> > warn me about "es es_ES" LINGUAS not being supported by that package.
> > That comes from eutils.eclass inside strip-linguas:
> > ewarn "Sorry, but ${PN} does not support the LINGUAS:" ${nols}
> > 
> > Is this warning really required, personally I know a lot of packages
> > that don't support spanish translations and I get no warning from them
> > (as they don't use strip-linguas). When I set LINGUAS variable in my
> > make.conf I assume a lot of packages won't support spanish translations,
> > and I see no point on being informed about that for some packages using
> > strip-linguas.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> OK with dropping message completely or use "einfo" instead of "ewarn"?

Just done

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]