From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S4BaN-0005DS-E8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:34:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70EF3E078D; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92291E07A1 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (122.Red-2-137-41.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.41.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F2E167A1D for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] media-optical and net-zope herds are empty From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1330867876.10135.59.camel@belkin4> References: <1330865251.10135.51.camel@belkin4> <20307.26809.997706.438188@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1330867876.10135.59.camel@belkin4> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WVL1nlRAs83yYMeq+PDQ" Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:34:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1330868052.10135.61.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 3f0754d8-e06f-461b-9b01-80f90c665298 X-Archives-Hash: f3ae104160087ba055fb73a737a87e2b --=-WVL1nlRAs83yYMeq+PDQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 14:31 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribi=C3=B3: > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 14:06 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribi=C3=B3: > > >>>>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >=20 > > > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like > > > herds are empty. > >=20 > > Sorry for nitpicking, but a "herd" is a collection of packages. So the > > herds are not empty, but they have no maintainers. >=20 > Well, I knew what a "herd" means exactly per devmanual ;), but, in real > world, that "collection of packages" is really orphan (are like > maintainer-needed packages but, what is worse, out of radar as they are > not listed as orphan at all) >=20 Also, after re-reading devmanual, being 100% strict that collection of packages need to be "associated to a set of maintainers" (that is currently not the case :( ) > (Personally I completely disagree with that sense of "herd" but, as > looks the meaning is there since the beginning...) >=20 > >=20 > > > If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop that > > > herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so. > >=20 > > > What do you think?=20 > >=20 > > How many packages are in these two herds? If it's only a few, then > > this certainly makes sense. > >=20 > > Ulrich > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > Only two for net-zope, but many more for, for example, sgml and > media-optical. --=-WVL1nlRAs83yYMeq+PDQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk9Tb1QACgkQCaWpQKGI+9QujgCdF2l21QApkxcnW6NJCyGMIvC8 Tf0Ani8Q+/h5XlpWdoVIECB3OH4QTyeq =Jw+j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WVL1nlRAs83yYMeq+PDQ--