From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S2pQR-000262-A3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:42:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C50A8E09E5; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E336DE09DC for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (90.Red-2-137-60.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.60.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 902051B4012 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The end of net-zope From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Oj86igurPU2lXamHOLNR" Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:42:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1330544520.4219.0.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 4e63a40e-bff6-450f-b54c-7b1eae12bd61 X-Archives-Hash: d58dba8a5ad42e9e0bee6975b028ca6e --=-Oj86igurPU2lXamHOLNR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mi=C3=A9, 29-02-2012 a las 09:51 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman escribi=C3=B3: > Tomorrow, March 1, is the deadline for removing almost all of the > Zope/Plone packages from the portage tree (those who still want them > can get them from Arfrever's Progress overlay). >=20 > Since only one or two packages would remain in the category, do we > want the category to stay around, or should it be removed from the > tree? We could move the remaining packages to dev-python. >=20 > Similarly, there is an empty herd. Do we have a procedure for > end-of-lifeing herds? >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Dirkjan >=20 >=20 You can see here how we dropped a herd last time from retirement: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D401169 --=-Oj86igurPU2lXamHOLNR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk9Of4gACgkQCaWpQKGI+9TXRQCfbv69sgMvIS/UQPr0Oytom7Yd DUoAmQEBVxNrELrj1vPcN/LpvVdbtEs1 =1t7V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Oj86igurPU2lXamHOLNR--