From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S26Gv-0004Mw-Eo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:30:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAB99E0772; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B438E076E for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (43.Red-2-137-55.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.55.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6773A1B4001 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4F4B9C07.7070504@gentoo.org> References: <4F47CF5C.4070508@gentoo.org> <4F4B9C07.7070504@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EvVZsFgYAB0PHAIvxwfa" Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:29:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1330370943.2525.0.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: d9e9ef7e-d6d0-419b-bba0-91965896cbe3 X-Archives-Hash: 1b95ab531f06b1fe3a6d57fb3f5fbec6 --=-EvVZsFgYAB0PHAIvxwfa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 27-02-2012 a las 16:06 +0100, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." escribi=C3= =B3: > On 2/24/12 6:56 PM, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > I'd like to modify eutils.eclass to only generate one command: > >=20 > > # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4' && \ > > rm '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4' >=20 > Given supporting comments to this thread (and totally off-topic > zfs/btrfs discussion), I'd like to commit the patch below in 24 hours. >=20 > > --- eutils.eclass.orig 2012-02-26 10:02:24.000000000 +0100 > > +++ eutils.eclass 2012-02-26 10:03:17.000000000 +0100 > > @@ -1276,16 +1276,8 @@ > > fi > > # temp hack for #348634 #357225 > > [[ ${PN} =3D=3D "mpfr" ]] && lib=3D${lib##*/} > > - ewarn " # revdep-rebuild --library '${lib}'" > > + ewarn " # revdep-rebuild --library '${lib}' && rm '${lib}'" > > done > > - if [[ ${notice} -eq 1 ]] ; then > > - ewarn > > - ewarn "Once you've finished running revdep-rebuild, it should be saf= e to" > > - ewarn "delete the old libraries. Here is a copy & paste for the laz= y:" > > - for lib in "$@" ; do > > - ewarn " # rm '${lib}'" > > - done > > - fi > > } > > =20 > > # @FUNCTION: built_with_use >=20 I think somebody pointed some "revdep-rebuild" versions where exiting with successful code even when failed, was fixed version stabilized? --=-EvVZsFgYAB0PHAIvxwfa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEUEABECAAYFAk9L2X8ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9ROJgCeMNpC2C8NN/5Vxy2KrFseFHTx G7MAmI6S37w3ilmxnh3EtuHTw21x/bQ= =5N6G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-EvVZsFgYAB0PHAIvxwfa--