From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-49959-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1S26Gv-0004Mw-Eo
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:30:09 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAB99E0772;
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:29:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B438E076E
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:29:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (43.Red-2-137-55.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.55.43])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: pacho)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6773A1B4001
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <4F4B9C07.7070504@gentoo.org>
References: <4F47CF5C.4070508@gentoo.org> <4F4B9C07.7070504@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EvVZsFgYAB0PHAIvxwfa"
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:29:03 +0100
Message-ID: <1330370943.2525.0.camel@belkin4>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3
X-Archives-Salt: d9e9ef7e-d6d0-419b-bba0-91965896cbe3
X-Archives-Hash: 1b95ab531f06b1fe3a6d57fb3f5fbec6
--=-EvVZsFgYAB0PHAIvxwfa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
El lun, 27-02-2012 a las 16:06 +0100, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." escribi=C3=
=B3:
> On 2/24/12 6:56 PM, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > I'd like to modify eutils.eclass to only generate one command:
> >=20
> > # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4' && \
> > rm '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4'
>=20
> Given supporting comments to this thread (and totally off-topic
> zfs/btrfs discussion), I'd like to commit the patch below in 24 hours.
>=20
> > --- eutils.eclass.orig 2012-02-26 10:02:24.000000000 +0100
> > +++ eutils.eclass 2012-02-26 10:03:17.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -1276,16 +1276,8 @@
> > fi
> > # temp hack for #348634 #357225
> > [[ ${PN} =3D=3D "mpfr" ]] && lib=3D${lib##*/}
> > - ewarn " # revdep-rebuild --library '${lib}'"
> > + ewarn " # revdep-rebuild --library '${lib}' && rm '${lib}'"
> > done
> > - if [[ ${notice} -eq 1 ]] ; then
> > - ewarn
> > - ewarn "Once you've finished running revdep-rebuild, it should be saf=
e to"
> > - ewarn "delete the old libraries. Here is a copy & paste for the laz=
y:"
> > - for lib in "$@" ; do
> > - ewarn " # rm '${lib}'"
> > - done
> > - fi
> > }
> > =20
> > # @FUNCTION: built_with_use
>=20
I think somebody pointed some "revdep-rebuild" versions where exiting
with successful code even when failed, was fixed version stabilized?
--=-EvVZsFgYAB0PHAIvxwfa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEUEABECAAYFAk9L2X8ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9ROJgCeMNpC2C8NN/5Vxy2KrFseFHTx
G7MAmI6S37w3ilmxnh3EtuHTw21x/bQ=
=5N6G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-EvVZsFgYAB0PHAIvxwfa--