Re: [gentoo-dev] preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy

[Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1324 bytes --]

El lun, 27-02-2012 a las 16:06 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió:
> On 2/24/12 6:56 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > I'd like to modify eutils.eclass to only generate one command:
> > 
> > # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4' && \
> > 	rm '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4'
> 
> Given supporting comments to this thread (and totally off-topic
> zfs/btrfs discussion), I'd like to commit the patch below in 24 hours.
> 
> > --- eutils.eclass.orig	2012-02-26 10:02:24.000000000 +0100
> > +++ eutils.eclass	2012-02-26 10:03:17.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -1276,16 +1276,8 @@
> >  		fi
> >  		# temp hack for #348634 #357225
> >  		[[ ${PN} == "mpfr" ]] && lib=${lib##*/}
> > -		ewarn "  # revdep-rebuild --library '${lib}'"
> > +		ewarn "  # revdep-rebuild --library '${lib}' && rm '${lib}'"
> >  	done
> > -	if [[ ${notice} -eq 1 ]] ; then
> > -		ewarn
> > -		ewarn "Once you've finished running revdep-rebuild, it should be safe to"
> > -		ewarn "delete the old libraries.  Here is a copy & paste for the lazy:"
> > -		for lib in "$@" ; do
> > -			ewarn "  # rm '${lib}'"
> > -		done
> > -	fi
> >  }
> >  
> >  # @FUNCTION: built_with_use
> 

I think somebody pointed some "revdep-rebuild" versions where exiting
with successful code even when failed, was fixed version stabilized?

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]