From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rzm0I-0001Fk-Tw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:27:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1452BE0FD9; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9CEE0EB4 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (101.Red-2-137-219.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.219.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8DDE1B400D for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20120220200220.3a54d88a@gentoo.org> References: <1329770054.21166.12.camel@belkin4> <20120220190313.57892cfa@gentoo.org> <4F42F0AA.50004@gentoo.org> <20120220200220.3a54d88a@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9evMNNSkW9imZxHew9Sa" Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:26:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1329816398.2868.1.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: ae996263-d482-4dad-952b-42b688601ce2 X-Archives-Hash: 1835bdc0419462e7557b28fcbb61d7bb --=-9evMNNSkW9imZxHew9Sa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 20:02 -0600, Ryan Hill escribi=C3=B3: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:17:30 -0800 > Zac Medico wrote: >=20 > > On 02/20/2012 05:03 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100 > > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > >=20 > > >> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are > > >> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near > > >> stabilization)? > > >> > > >> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked= for > > >> testing purposes :-/ > > >=20 > > > Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that make= s > > > people's systems unbootable. > > >=20 > > > I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions. > >=20 > > Stabilize grub-1.99, and modify the grub-0.9x ebuilds to die if they > > can't find a supported compiler. >=20 > What's the state of 1.99? I know someone was working on it recently. We= 'd > also have to update the handbooks. I think it could be several months of > work to get it ready, and I'd like to unmask 4.6 last September. >=20 >=20 As looks like fixing old grub is far away because nobody know what is causing that issues, probably trying to get grub-1.99 ready for stabilization would be interesting (we will need to do that sooner or later anyway) --=-9evMNNSkW9imZxHew9Sa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk9DY04ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9QZVQCcD4PB5bb0VcsHssd/eFkaICLI gn0AniZwtKWNyL30p1pVccPnrA6mfO0O =CpPG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9evMNNSkW9imZxHew9Sa--