From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwta5-0004LN-Uz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:56:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A8B2E0ADE; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1165DE0AC4 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (187.Red-2-136-133.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.136.133.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 519121B400E; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About masking net-misc/mDNSResponder for removal From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: treecleaner@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1328787665.14691.4.camel@belkin4> References: <1328787665.14691.4.camel@belkin4> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pF7CmBRCXBCPYH2424Km" Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:55:32 +0100 Message-ID: <1329130532.2549.2.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: cb0d13ce-7f2c-4a5b-ad14-cd8852d48674 X-Archives-Hash: 8b51c9c84e9a1ef6f5957dbf7516bb6d --=-pF7CmBRCXBCPYH2424Km Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El jue, 09-02-2012 a las 12:41 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribi=C3=B3: > Hello >=20 > Looks like our net-misc/mDNSResponder packages are orphan and > unmaintained for a looong time, they also have some opened bugs (with > hangs, build problems...) and looks like avahi with mdns compat can > replace it. >=20 > OK with masking it for removal? If not, is anyone willing to maintain > it? OK to start dropping it from dependencies and mask it for removal? --=-pF7CmBRCXBCPYH2424Km Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk847CQACgkQCaWpQKGI+9RTUwCfTLHkyfUx742U3RJl5pNmDky1 5qoAniP3WrR0cHA2kOzdFdYcM68iqKm5 =aD1S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pF7CmBRCXBCPYH2424Km--