From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-49665-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RsVNd-0002OF-Bi
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:17:28 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5707AE0878;
	Wed,  1 Feb 2012 08:17:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13CFE085D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  1 Feb 2012 08:16:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.43] (unknown [96.231.195.26])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23A941B408A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  1 Feb 2012 08:16:23 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1328084181.8348.6.camel@rook>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go
 into?
From: Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:16:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4F28D54B.9020407@gentoo.org>
References: <4F28D54B.9020407@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Archives-Salt: 2037faac-0932-4028-8157-6effde157a0a
X-Archives-Hash: d7e752a2203aa7772a4ede1dd191d815

On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 07:01 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>   spacenavd
>     driver daemon (with optional X support)
>       --> sys-apps/spacenavd ?
>       --> app-misc/spacenavd ?
>       --> .. ?

I would suggest either sys-apps or x11-drivers.

>   libspnav
>     library accessing before-mentioned daemon
>       --> dev-libs/libspnav ?
>       --> media-libs/libspnav ?
>       --> sys-libs/libspnav ?
>       --> .. ?

dev-libs seems reasonable.

sys-libs definitely feels wrong, libspnav would look out of place in
that exclusive company of core system libraries.

-Alexandre