From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rcall-000502-CC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:48:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C102F21C056; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DF021C020 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (151.Red-2-137-14.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.14.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE47C1B4008; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: deprecate /usr/share/doc/$PF From: Pacho Ramos To: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20111219093104.3cdad034@pomiocik.lan> References: <20111218230205.4df86707@pomiocik.lan> <1324249665.2962.2.camel@belkin4> <20111219093104.3cdad034@pomiocik.lan> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cLq7/OzYYRHvvYnWZdJg" Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:47:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1324291668.3529.4.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: 75dc015d-2d01-4bbb-9e9e-bda22ab0a87d X-Archives-Hash: d0972e2b78ae5baf443fecc81fe65cfe --=-cLq7/OzYYRHvvYnWZdJg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 19-12-2011 a las 09:31 +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny escribi=C3=B3: > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:07:45 +0100 > Pacho Ramos wrote: >=20 > > El dom, 18-12-2011 a las 23:02 +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny escribi=C3= =B3: > > [...] > > > > Q6: Why can't the dodoc/dohtml path be changed before EAPI-5? > > > > A6: Because the path where dodoc and dohtml install files is part > > > > of the PMS. Portage can't just change it on its own. A possible > > > > workaround for current EAPIs is adding new-style dodoc/dohtml > > > > analogues to an eclass. > > >=20 > > > I think some of devs agree we should be allowed to fix past mistakes > > > without waiting another 20 years till the tree is migrated to a new > > > EAPI... > > >=20 > >=20 > > Maybe this situation could be improved if there was a policy forcing > > us to try to use latest EAPI when possible for any package update, > > that way we would move faster to latest eapi and even deprecate older > > eapis easily >=20 > Still unlikely. A bunch of old eclasses will force ebuilds to be EAPI 0 > or so. >=20 Well, I was meaning eapis different than 0, I know it will need to be kept more time due backwards compatibility ;) Regarding other eapis, how many eclasses are still requiring old eapis? I think games.eclass was one of them, but haven't reviewed others :S --=-cLq7/OzYYRHvvYnWZdJg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk7vFlQACgkQCaWpQKGI+9TlRwCeJojOP6377nwqZkh3ZYhIKOiK NLEAn3xdSfCp6D9XzGE0aKikm1tnMvrO =cyFm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cLq7/OzYYRHvvYnWZdJg--