From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RHJBb-0005gF-0v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:47:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBF4CE0444; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BC2E0384 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (40.red-80-29-60.adsl.static.ccgg.telefonica.net [80.29.60.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80581641C1 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: news item for png15 From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1319181789.5004.4.camel@beldin> References: <4E975FCE.1060407@gentoo.org> <20111013204828.3523dbb8@gentoo.org> <1318582000.1855.2.camel@belkin4> <4E97F884.9000309@gmail.com> <1318626202.1855.11.camel@belkin4> <1319181789.5004.4.camel@beldin> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AMjnU/g+vb9v7mRunZUC" Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:46:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1319219187.4161.2.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 0c56a1e523fe41c3716bbfe7613e044b --=-AMjnU/g+vb9v7mRunZUC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El vie, 21-10-2011 a las 02:23 -0500, Paul Varner escribi=C3=B3: > On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 23:03 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: >=20 > > It shouldn't, I am sure I have used this some times before and it worke= d > > as expected, but I don't know when revdep-rebuild cache files are > > removed (and then, broken packages recalculated) :-/=20 > >=20 > > Any revdep-rebuild maintainer here to clarify this please? Thanks :) > =20 > Actually all of the current versions of revdep-rebuild are broken and > always remove the cache files after completion. The exception to this is > when --pretend is used. >=20 > When it is fixed in the next version of gentoolkit, the behavior is to > keep the files if it is a pretend run or if emerge exits with a non-zero > status. >=20 > Note: emerge will exit with a non-zero status if --keep-going is used > and there is a build failure. >=20 > Regards, > Paul >=20 OK, thanks a lot for the info :) --=-AMjnU/g+vb9v7mRunZUC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk6hr/MACgkQCaWpQKGI+9TFpwCfY+rw2TuD7TeQguIneulIalVD yCwAnjFuLHXA0zzNUHhOv6RkHn9fxHgE =7fIh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AMjnU/g+vb9v7mRunZUC--