From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1REN2V-0000pF-Bs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:17:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3C4021C14E; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3591621C116 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.110] (206-248-185-53.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.185.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tester) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A8F91B4004 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1318519027.3885.5.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev From: Olivier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cr=EAte?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:17:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111012044023.GA8203@waltdnes.org> References: <20111012044023.GA8203@waltdnes.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qhIzSnt4uC5d5E++FOs6" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 13f3965f882947fba582c7a16693db31 --=-qhIzSnt4uC5d5E++FOs6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 00:40 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > Hi all >=20 > Recently, there was a firestorm on the gentoo-user list over the idea > that udev would eventually require /usr to be on the same physical > parition as /, or else use initramfs, which is its own can of worms. I'm > not a programmer, let alone a developer. Rather than merely ranting, I > went and searched for an alternative. You completely misunderstand what Kay wants, what we are saying that is that you need to mount /usr at the same time as you mount /, which you can still do in your initramfs, etc. That said, we, the GNOME upstream, think that having a separate /usr is a completely stupid idea. --=20 Olivier Cr=EAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer --=-qhIzSnt4uC5d5E++FOs6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk6XAPMACgkQHTiOWk7ZorsJWgCeORyjR9OMXahKCYF2Qbq2cxel XSsAn1jnOWdmwevwv+85lIpGTY25ZhYd =FzPl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qhIzSnt4uC5d5E++FOs6--