From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R3Wxh-0005rW-Dc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:39:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5786621C1EE; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC8321C1EB for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (abss250.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.8.138.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aidecoe) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F9AB1B4011 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:38:38 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Amadeusz_=C5=BBo=C5=82nowski?= To: gentoo-dev Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] obs eclasses In-reply-to: <20079.37415.531795.910965@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20110913111128.GA27880@misibook.miska.isageek.net> <1315912613-sup-7918@raeviah> <4E6F4BDA.70505@gentoo.org> <1315918003-sup-9563@raeviah> <20110913144425.GF31178@comet> <4E6F7D97.6080609@gentoo.org> <20110913164100.GH31178@comet> <20079.37415.531795.910965@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:38:33 +0200 Message-Id: <1315935041-sup-2596@raeviah> User-Agent: Sup/git Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1315935513-528697-23103-1530-1-=" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 25b9c907ed37d600e9798a7750e9d97a --=-1315935513-528697-23103-1530-1-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Excerpts from Ulrich Mueller's message of 2011-09-13 19:25:59 +0200: > >>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > = > > Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have > > a great precedent. > = > > Quoting PMS: > = > > "The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0 to 3.2 > > in November 2009 (see http://www.gentoo. > > org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091109.txt)." > = > > So we could just retroactively update it again and let people scream > > if they're actually affected by this. > = > If you read the quoted council log, you'll find that the retroactive > change was done because usage of bash 3.2 features in the tree was > already widespread at that time. This is very different from the > current situation, therefore it is not at all a precedent. > = > Ulrich So we need to do it =E2=80=9Cillegally=E2=80=9D first to make it =E2=80=9C= legal=E2=80=9D? -- = Amadeusz =C5=BBo=C5=82nowski PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5 --=-1315935513-528697-23103-1530-1-= Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOb5UZAAoJEPATRTHh2/q1amcH/1oPg5b7zPt51TDfuj7u47VS GMZxDI79AAH1dQOis4uun31zU4TENLnmyQrJe9kD/IT3oha+eAan/VPZgg78Jgpq Ps2UZDtcs3y9dnv0Xuc7y4YDI0FznbJ/VVpSQQYDEpzng2ZHOOVNmLVlsgiQc9Mr SAIL97djnEmpupFqNKqHgMI/1PNHAP8LUvfQzj6inrUT5dFMHOYOsqPodC+UnV+3 Gq37wPgwuPhPvbFaZVOYociZ4svwq9UtRe7SZK1rvHWxktkLcCzkyXjVNT+txz5H snRFN6vHAlFPTur0/1Ogs9JuNw/mYx2ByGTU+9MDJRbeBpDbld5WLeEHu4H09xQ= =o+5Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1315935513-528697-23103-1530-1-=--