From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QMQSX-0002ue-Gh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:01:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 852C21C0B4; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA281C04E for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.117] (MTLXPQAK-1176055545.sdsl.bell.ca [70.25.46.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tester) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9562F1B4030 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory From: Olivier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cr=EAte?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <20110517165748.GA3266@linux1> <1305655899.18096.4.camel@tablet> <20110517192056.GA13002@Vereniki.lan> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UNMM8jp4F7rxf4LapS/W" Organization: Gentoo Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:00:41 -0400 Message-ID: <1305662441.2645.1.camel@TesterTop4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: db4e7e13279d8000ba01968c91cd3097 --=-UNMM8jp4F7rxf4LapS/W Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 01:18 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > Maybe you should use /var/tmp for that? Or ~/tmp/ ? >=20 > OTOH, we could use an rc.conf configuration variable to control > whether /tmp is mounted as tmpfs. Having /tmp and /var/tmp as tmpfs sounds like a terrible idea.. I don't think we should facilitate it in any way. --=20 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer --=-UNMM8jp4F7rxf4LapS/W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk3S0+kACgkQHTiOWk7ZortwgwCdGp4YIY2WehjFY7qkXgxnWgDC ihYAn3pYectMVvwX8WOmjOp2VusX2cgG =W7HC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UNMM8jp4F7rxf4LapS/W--