From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QG92w-0002Bm-PT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:13:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FC161C0A7; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26811C04D for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (ppp85-141-129-0.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [85.141.129.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pva) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DF532AC038 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Devmanual text on ChangeLogs From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4DBBD02B.3060909@gentoo.org> References: <4DBBCC6D.7080504@gentoo.org> <4DBBD02B.3060909@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:12:01 +0400 Message-ID: <1304165521.27786.27.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 09a5b353f54d3a96b0ffd4a14478f404 =D0=92 =D0=A1=D0=B1=D1=82, 30/04/2011 =D0=B2 12:02 +0300, Samuli Suominen= =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On 04/30/2011 11:46 AM, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > > I propose a simple new text: "Every commit should have an entry in > > ChangeLog." Nonfunctional commits should not be recored in ChangeLog. Personally I quite frequently add URLs of upstream bug reports in ChangeLog. I don't think this addition should be recorded in ChangeLog. > > If we eventually autogenerate them from git logs this would > > happen any way (unless some kind of filtering system is in the middle= ) > > so we could already start now. Without filtering system ChangeLogs are useless. Also I need some way to edit ChangeLogs manually. > "Every new file, and modification to existing file should have an entry > in ChangeLog." to skip the proper ChangeLog-less removals. Removal is quite functional change so it should be recored. --=20 Peter.