From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QAjeQ-0002Zf-2E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:05:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4625C1C078; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE50E1C08B for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408331B4034 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:04:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.895 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.895 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.296, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZxFeact7wAK for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07691B4069 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAjdE-0007cj-RP for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:04:20 +0200 Received: from liten.csbnet.se ([95.80.10.140]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:04:20 +0200 Received: from xake by liten.csbnet.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:04:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Peter Hjalmarsson Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc portage news item Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:04:09 +0200 Message-ID: <1302876249.5535.4.camel@lillen> References: <20110413181538.GA2894@linux1> <4DA5EE4C.20808@gentoo.org> <20110413195851.GB3116@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: liten.csbnet.se In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e4a526ae190b0a14f4196e884bf9b1bf tor 2011-04-14 klockan 08:09 +0000 skrev Duncan: > 1) While baselayout-1 had a parallel boot option, it was quite broken and= =20 > (partly or entirely, not sure which) non-functional. The same thing in= =20 > baselayout-2/openrc works WELL and I use it all the time. (Given the=20 > emphasis placed on this in the media, the various boot-timing contests,= =20 > etc, and the fact that this feature puts Gentoo in-play again in regard t= o=20 > speed-boots, it's a pretty big positive in favor of upgrading.) >=20 This feature is still not really perfect, at least not perfect enought. Use squid on a system where it takes longer for its daemon to exist (like my router, where the media is a intel SSD, 4GB memory and a AMD Athlon 2x on the AM3 socket) and you will see lots of outputs from openrc about all those scripts waiting for it to end... So maybe when that feature is ready to be enabled by default? Regards Peter Hjalmarsson