From: Peter Hjalmarsson <xake@rymdraket.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc portage news item
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:04:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302876249.5535.4.camel@lillen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2011.04.14.08.09.07@cox.net>
tor 2011-04-14 klockan 08:09 +0000 skrev Duncan:
> 1) While baselayout-1 had a parallel boot option, it was quite broken and
> (partly or entirely, not sure which) non-functional. The same thing in
> baselayout-2/openrc works WELL and I use it all the time. (Given the
> emphasis placed on this in the media, the various boot-timing contests,
> etc, and the fact that this feature puts Gentoo in-play again in regard to
> speed-boots, it's a pretty big positive in favor of upgrading.)
>
This feature is still not really perfect, at least not perfect enought.
Use squid on a system where it takes longer for its daemon to exist
(like my router, where the media is a intel SSD, 4GB memory and a AMD
Athlon 2x on the AM3 socket) and you will see lots of outputs from
openrc about all those scripts waiting for it to end...
So maybe when that feature is ready to be enabled by default?
Regards
Peter Hjalmarsson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-15 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-13 18:15 [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item William Hubbs
2011-04-13 18:27 ` Thomas Beierlein
2011-04-13 18:32 ` justin
2011-04-13 18:41 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-04-13 19:58 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-14 8:09 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-14 11:44 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-15 14:04 ` Peter Hjalmarsson [this message]
2011-04-15 19:01 ` Duncan
2011-04-13 19:56 ` [gentoo-dev] " William Hubbs
2011-04-14 5:30 ` justin
2011-04-14 7:21 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-04-14 8:19 ` justin
2011-04-14 8:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-14 14:44 ` Dale
2011-04-14 15:41 ` Matthew Summers
2011-04-14 16:12 ` Dale
2011-04-14 18:48 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-14 10:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kfir Lavi
2011-04-14 10:32 ` Kfir Lavi
2011-04-14 10:51 ` Tomá? Chvátal
2011-04-14 11:03 ` Pacho Ramos
2011-04-14 11:21 ` Thomas Beierlein
2011-04-14 11:27 ` Sylvain Alain
2011-04-21 1:12 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-04-21 2:23 ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-04-21 2:34 ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-04-22 10:39 ` Lars Wendler
2011-04-29 18:41 ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30 2:19 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-30 4:59 ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30 7:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-30 11:46 ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30 12:03 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-30 12:58 ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30 13:06 ` Jeremy Olexa
2011-04-30 13:40 ` Brian Harring
2011-04-29 7:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " William Hubbs
2011-04-29 11:21 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-29 11:28 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-29 17:18 ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-29 17:25 ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-29 17:32 ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-29 17:52 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-29 17:58 ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-30 0:34 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-30 9:04 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2011-04-30 12:41 ` Roy Bamford
2011-04-29 14:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-05-01 19:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " William Hubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302876249.5535.4.camel@lillen \
--to=xake@rymdraket.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox