From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q341j-0001iN-7b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:13:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3C4A1C164; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0031C17C for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (unknown [94.158.169.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pva) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B26C1B4082 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:11:12 +0300 Message-ID: <1301047872.24707.10.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 35b4ea73f701829347b9e2d772881603 =D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 24/03/2011 =D0=B2 17:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger = =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned > Manifest's anymore ?=20 Why? Without policy on how we do that and more importantly how we check that signing makes no sense... --=20 Peter.