From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Pp37j-0004Xh-N1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:26:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AE76E0B33; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2B5E0AFB for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.201] (23.151.222.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.222.151.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E84BF1B4072 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20110214134147.5047e2aa@googlemail.com> References: <1297616621.21312.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1297678539.7123.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1297679073.16086.3.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> <1297679642.7123.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1297679821.16086.5.camel@gdartigu.lan.rep.sj> <1297680056.7123.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1297680155.7123.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110214131928.050280ee@googlemail.com> <1297690432.7123.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110214134147.5047e2aa@googlemail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-G7apImcpJ4str7dpEE8l" Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:25:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1297707927.7123.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e01f7765376795c94d05da1d847ac73f --=-G7apImcpJ4str7dpEE8l Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 13:41 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh escribi=C3=B3: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:33:52 +0100 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > You should be able to -* them out... -* is fine (assuming Portage > > > handles it) since we know what the null set is; it's just * that's > > > the problem. > >=20 > > Yeah, portage handles it, but thought -* also had the same problem, > > thanks for clarifying, anyway, latest approach on only enable ptp2 by > > default looks fine for me=20 >=20 > No, -* is fine, so long as Portage doesn't pass it through literally. >=20 > The problem, specifically, is that things like this are totally legal > and are done by some packages: >=20 > IUSE=3D"linguas_en linguas_fr" >=20 > if use linguas_de ; then >=20 > if has linguas_de $LINGUAS ; then >=20 > if has linguas_de $USE ; then >=20 > So if you were to set LINGUAS=3D"*", there would have to be some magic > way for the package mangler to know that linguas_de exists, even if > there's no mention of it anywhere in any user config files or in IUSE > (and no, the desc files aren't a complete list either). >=20 > The reason for this, historically, was that IUSE was used purely for > display purposes by Portage, whilst USE was worked out from everything > in config files, regardless of whether or not the ebuild claimed to use > it. That meant there was absolutely nothing stopping you from making > IUSE incomplete... >=20 Ah, thanks for the explanation. Regards --=-G7apImcpJ4str7dpEE8l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk1Zc5cACgkQCaWpQKGI+9TJegCdFIAGd/vk+fykeGfjlzc1geB0 RVcAn0Ob23GKtOr0YbVy4xHYA6BO+huf =m14D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-G7apImcpJ4str7dpEE8l--