From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Povn8-00067j-3R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:36:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4CFAE0A4F; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD52E0A07 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.201] (23.151.222.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.222.151.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EEF81B4030 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20110213201709.019c46e4@googlemail.com> References: <1297616621.21312.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110213170905.569595d6@googlemail.com> <1297625483.7535.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110213193440.475debea@googlemail.com> <1297627231.7535.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110213201709.019c46e4@googlemail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mkVJLbAvwmWv5Tq1ctOD" Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:35:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1297679742.7123.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 87a88ad461266dd504185283b5ffc99c --=-mkVJLbAvwmWv5Tq1ctOD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 20:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh escribi=C3=B3: > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:00:31 +0100 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > If rest of gnome team agrees, I think we could go with, but I still > > fail to see what is the "technical" problem on allowing CAMERAS=3D"*" > > to be used :-| >=20 > 'cameras_*' isn't a valid use flag name, so the package mangler can't > just pass the * through to the ebuild, which means it has to expand the > value itself. But there's no complete list of every CAMERA value > anywhere, so it can't. >=20 > There were plans to fix this in EAPI 4 by requiring that IUSE be > accurate. That would have allowed the package mangler to use IUSE to > get a complete list of known CAMERAS and be able to expand * that way. > Unfortunately, that feature got dropped, and so in EAPI 4 you're still > allowed to make use of USE_EXPAND variables without making sure IUSE is > complete. >=20 Do you know if there are any plans on implementing it on a future EAPI? I think being able to simply enable all of them with "*" would be interesting (at least in the future) Thanks for the information --=-mkVJLbAvwmWv5Tq1ctOD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk1ZBX4ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9R1tACfSccibtagfP5S9D01cbRgt4dH A9MAn0pLfjOZCK7ZMRxRbn4vbqLnqj1D =2wgq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mkVJLbAvwmWv5Tq1ctOD--