From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-44486-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Poi8d-0005KZ-TF
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:01:44 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 976DBE0C09;
	Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:01:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B911E0BEF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:00:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.201] (23.151.222.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.222.151.23])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE7F21B403E;
	Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:00:34 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: gnome <gnome@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110213193440.475debea@googlemail.com>
References: <1297616621.21312.35.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20110213170905.569595d6@googlemail.com>
	 <1297625483.7535.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20110213193440.475debea@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iFNNn4EkShfhamZCtJAe"
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:00:31 +0100
Message-ID: <1297627231.7535.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: cf3d5d791074eac5156ec917e5e96a6e


--=-iFNNn4EkShfhamZCtJAe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:34 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:31:23 +0100
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Wouldn't be any shorter way to build all CAMERAS? We don't want to
> > default to enabling all, with the new way of handling this, if CAMERAS
> > is not set or is empty, nothing will be built but, if CAMERAS=3D"*"
> > shouldn't be used, what should we use instead of having to manually
> > add all of them to make.conf (from a user point of view)
>=20
> Why not specify all the CAMERAS you know about as being on by default in
> the profile? Users who care enough can override this with an explicit
> subset.
>=20

If rest of gnome team agrees, I think we could go with, but I still fail
to see what is the "technical" problem on allowing CAMERAS=3D"*" to be
used :-|

--=-iFNNn4EkShfhamZCtJAe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk1YOF8ACgkQCaWpQKGI+9SiIACfXSbG6xAbL6TOBylRPeR+Hf/e
c3wAnA6BeWJSjUayGGrAW/+Np4qaVzAK
=eOSD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-iFNNn4EkShfhamZCtJAe--