Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item

[Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 960 bytes --]

On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 17:09 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:03:41 +0100
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Please see attached news item for reviewing as part of the fix for
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346491
> 
> CAMERAS=* shouldn't be legal. Since the strict IUSE stuff was dropped
> from EAPI 4, and since IUSE isn't complete in any EAPI, there's no way
> of implementing it correctly.
> 
> If you want to default to enabling a whole load of stuff, but allowing
> users to override that, then you do it by listing things explicitly in
> profiles.
> 

Wouldn't be any shorter way to build all CAMERAS? We don't want to
default to enabling all, with the new way of handling this, if CAMERAS
is not set or is empty, nothing will be built but, if CAMERAS="*"
shouldn't be used, what should we use instead of having to manually add
all of them to make.conf (from a user point of view)

Thanks

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]