From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PofZw-0004Fi-5E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:17:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68400E08FF; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FCEE08DA for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.201] (23.151.222.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.222.151.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C30771B4077; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: gnome In-Reply-To: <20110213170905.569595d6@googlemail.com> References: <1297616621.21312.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110213170905.569595d6@googlemail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uzPM4gUm4NKmG49ZAVlN" Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:16:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1297617417.23920.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 601d3e80c3ac78edeb7acbbc98721e09 --=-uzPM4gUm4NKmG49ZAVlN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 17:09 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh escribi=C3=B3: > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:03:41 +0100 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Please see attached news item for reviewing as part of the fix for > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D346491 >=20 > CAMERAS=3D* shouldn't be legal. Since the strict IUSE stuff was dropped > from EAPI 4, and since IUSE isn't complete in any EAPI, there's no way > of implementing it correctly. >=20 > If you want to default to enabling a whole load of stuff, but allowing > users to override that, then you do it by listing things explicitly in > profiles. >=20 Will CC the rest of the team for thinking about this then --=-uzPM4gUm4NKmG49ZAVlN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk1YEgkACgkQCaWpQKGI+9S7hACfaf+6I9PkJj0RMmj6VJBbjNQc VdEAn3vD7GdESD4kYz2EBJDCtSFoFWFP =JlG/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uzPM4gUm4NKmG49ZAVlN--